Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Aug;77(8):955-9.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.8.955.

Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise

Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise

S M Taffel et al. Am J Public Health. 1987 Aug.

Abstract

The rate of cesarean section delivery in the United States rose from 4.5 per 100 deliveries in 1965 to 22.7 in 1985, and in 1985 an estimated 851,000 live births were cesarean deliveries, according to data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. This increase has been observed for all ages, and within all regions of the country. The rate for teenagers and mothers aged 20 to 29 was five to six times as high in 1985 as in 1965, and four times as high for mothers aged 30 years and older. Repeat cesareans account for an increasing share of all cesarean deliveries; in 1985 one in three cesareans were repeats. The increase in the cesarean rate of 6.2 percentage points between 1980 and 1985 (from 16.5 to 22.7) was partitioned according to five complications of delivery recorded on hospital discharge records: previous cesarean delivery, breech presentation, dystocia, fetal distress, and all other complications. Nearly half (48 per cent) of the increase was associated with previous cesarean delivery, 29 per cent with dystocia, 16 per cent with fetal distress, 5 per cent with breech presentation, and 2 per cent with all other complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul;52(1):50-2 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Feb;55(2):175-80 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Mar 15;142(6 Pt 1):643-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 15;144(6):671-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1983 Aug;73(8):861-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources