The effects of an online decision aid to support the reproductive decision-making process of genetically at risk couples-A pilot study
- PMID: 36056622
- PMCID: PMC10087273
- DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1631
The effects of an online decision aid to support the reproductive decision-making process of genetically at risk couples-A pilot study
Abstract
Couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring may experience doubts about their reproductive options. This study examines the effects of an online decision aid (DA) on the (joint) reproductive decision-making process of couples (not pregnant at time of inclusion) at risk of transmitting a genetic disease to their offspring. The primary outcome is decisional conflict, and secondary outcomes are knowledge, realistic expectations, deliberation, joint informed decision-making, and decisional self-efficacy. These outcomes were measured with a pretest-posttest design: before use (T0), after use (T1), and 2 weeks after use (T2) of the decision aid (DA). Usability of the DA was assessed at T1. Paired sample t-tests were used to compute differences between baseline and subsequent measurements. The comparisons of T0-T1 and T0-T2 indicate a significant reduction in mean decisional conflict scores with stronger effects for participants with high baseline decisional conflict scores. Furthermore, use of the DA led to increased knowledge, improved realistic expectations, and increased levels of deliberation, with higher increase in participants with low baseline scores. Decision self-efficacy only improved for participants with lower baseline scores. Participants indicated that the information in the DA was comprehensible and clearly organized. These first results indicate that this online DA is an appropriate tool to support couples at risk of transmitting a genetic disease and a desire to have (a) child(ren) in their reproductive decision-making process.
Keywords: (joint informed) decision-making; decision aid; decisional conflict; genetic counseling; preimplantation genetic testing (PGT); reproductive genetics.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Conflict of interest statement
Y. Severijns, M.W.F. Heijmans, L. van Osch, C.E.M. de Die‐Smulders, H. de Vries, S.M.J. van Kuijk, E.K. Bijlsma, N. Corsten‐Janssen, S.J.R. Joosten, K.D. Lichtenbelt, C.P.E. Ottenheim, K.E. Stuurman, and M.B. Tan‐Sindhunata declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Y. Severijns, M.W.F. Heijmans, L. van Osch, C.E.M. de Die‐Smulders, H. de Vries, S.M.J. van Kuijk, E.K. Bijlsma, N. Corsten‐Janssen, S.J.R. Joosten, K.D. Lichtenbelt, C.P.E. Ottenheim, K.E. Stuurman, and M.B. Tan‐Sindhunata declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Alvarez, B. (2018). Reproductive decision making in Spain: Heterosexual couples' narratives about how they chose to have children. Journal of Family Issues, 39(13), 3487–3507.
-
- Bunn, H. , & O'Connor, A. (1996). Validation of client decision‐making instruments in the context of psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 28(3), 13–27. - PubMed
-
- Crutzen, R. , Beekers, N. , van Eenbergen, M. , Becker, M. , Jongen, L. , & van Osch, L. (2014). E‐loyalty towards a cancer information website: Applying a theoretical framework. Psycho‐Oncology, 23(6), 685–691. - PubMed
-
- De Die‐Smulders, C. , De Wert, G. , Liebaers, I. , Tibben, A. , & Evers‐Kiebooms, G. (2013). Reproductive options for prospective parents in families with Huntington's disease: Clinical, psychological and ethical reflections. Human Reproduction Update, 19(3), 304–315. - PubMed
-
- Decruyenaere, M. , Evers‐Kiebooms, G. , Boogaerts, A. , Philippe, K. , Demyttenaere, K. , Dom, R. , Vandenberghe, W. , & Fryns, J. P. (2007). The complexity of reproductive decision‐making in asymptomatic carriers of the Huntington mutation. European Journal of Human Genetics: EJHG, 15(4), 453–462. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
