Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 3;23(1):834.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7.

Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care

J Knoop  1 , W van Lankveld  2 , L Beijer  2   3 , F J B Geerdink  4 , M W Heymans  5 , T J Hoogeboom  6 , S Hoppenbrouwers  7   8 , E van Overmeeren  9 , R Soer  4   10 , C Veenhof  11 , K C P Vissers  12 , P J van der Wees  6 , M Sappelli  7 , J B Staal  2   6
Affiliations

Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care

J Knoop et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pain and to compare this with current practice and 'traditional' prediction modeling.

Methods: Prognostic cohort-study in primary care physiotherapy. Patients (n = 247) with acute low back pain (≤ one month) consulting physiotherapists were included. Candidate predictors were assessed by questionnaire at baseline and (to capture early recovery) after one and two weeks. Primary outcome was non-recovery after three months, defined as at least mild pain (Numeric Rating Scale > 2/10). Machine learning models to predict non-recovery were developed and internally validated, and compared with two current practices in physiotherapy (STarT Back tool and physiotherapists' expectation) and 'traditional' logistic regression analysis.

Results: Forty-seven percent of the participants did not recover at three months. The best performing machine learning model showed acceptable predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.66). Although this was no better than a'traditional' logistic regression model, it outperformed current practice.

Conclusions: We developed two prognostic models containing partially different predictors, with acceptable performance for predicting (non-)recovery in patients with acute LBP, which was better than current practice. Our prognostic models have the potential of integration in a clinical decision support system to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment of acute low back pain, but needs external validation first.

Keywords: Acute; Low back pain; Machine learning; Prognostic; Recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Knoop is associate editor of BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Staal is senior editors board member of BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study inclusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC-curves of (a) final ML-model, (b) SBT low vs medium/high risk profile, (c) physiotherapists’ expectation of recovery and (d) final logistic regression model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Calibration plot of final ML-model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021;S0140–6736(21):00733–739. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA. 2010;303(13):1295–12302. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.344. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menezes Costa LC, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Herbert RD, Costa LO. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E613–E624. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111271. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ. 2003;327(7410):323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. da Silva T, Mills K, Brown BT, Pocovi N, de Campos T, Maher C, Hancock MJ. Recurrence of low back pain is common: a prospective inception cohort study. J Physiother. 2019;65(3):159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.04.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources