Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):45.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00481-3.

The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer

Heying Duan et al. Cancer Imaging. .

Abstract

In the era of precision medicine, oncological imaging techniques are advancing at a rapid pace, particularly molecular imaging with promising new targets for prostate cancer (PC) such as gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) along the established and indispensable prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). As PC is characterized by heterogenous tumor biology ranging from indolent to aggressive disease, distinguishing clinically significant tumors from indolent disease is critical. Multiparametric MRI- and PET-targeted prostate biopsies mitigate the shortcomings and risks of standard systematic template biopsy by identifying more significant cancers.Focal treatment for localized disease is a minimally invasive approach that targets the index tumor - the lesion of the highest grade - while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. Real-time MRI-guidance and thermal control with MR-thermometry, improves treatment accuracy and results in lower rates of functional side effects. PET imaging could be an useful tool to assess response to treatment compared to invasive prostate biopsies.In this comprehensive review, we focus on the image-guided detection and treatment of localized primary prostate cancer, its current status and future perspectives.

Keywords: 68 Ga-PSMA; 68 Ga-RM2; Image-guided; PET; Prostate Cancer; mpMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HD and AI declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
48-year-old man presents with PSA 11.30 ng/mL and PSA density 0.31 ng/mL2 for targeted prostate biopsy: mpMRI A shows a PI-RADS 4 lesion in the right lateral base whereas 68 Ga-PSMA11 axial PET B, axial fused PET/MRI C, and maximum intensity projection (MIP) D reveal a larger tumor volume. Subsequent PET-targeted biopsy resulted in a Gleason score 4 + 3 prostate cancer
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
62-year-old man with PSA 7.0 ng/mL and PSA density 0.24 ng/mL2. MRI shows a PI-RADS 4 lesion in the right lateral base with color coded needle tracks from biopsy; green-benign, yellow-Gleason score 3 + 3, red-Gleason score 3 + 4 or higher A, and target tumor volume B. 68 Ga-PSMA11 C and 68 Ga-RM2 D axial PET, axial fused PET/MRI, and MIP show congruent focal uptake in the right prostate lesion. The lesion was treated with HIFU; resolution on both 68 Ga-PSMA11 and 68 Ga-RM2 PET/MRI was seen 6 months after treatment
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
78-year-old man presents with PSA 15.90 ng/mL and PSA density 0.14 ng/mL2 for PET-targeted HIFU of a PI-RADS 5 lesion in the right posterior apex. Pre-therapy 68 Ga-PSMA11 A and 68 Ga-RM2 C axial PET, axial fused PET/MRI, MRI, and MIP images show concordant focal uptake in the right posterior prostate (red arrows). After HIFU, 68 Ga-PSMA11 B and 68 Ga-RM2 D axial PET, axial fused PET/MRI, MRI, and MIP show structural changes with urine pooling in the treated area (blue arrows) but no pathologic uptake. Biopsy confirmed no evidence of PC in the treated area

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klotz L. Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2020;125(3):346–354. doi: 10.1111/bju.14935. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pastor-Navarro B, Rubio-Briones J, Borque-Fernando A, Esteban LM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Lopez-Guerrero JA. Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6266. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126266. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES. NCCN Guidelines Updates: Management of Prostate Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(5.5):583–586. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances