Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures
- PMID: 36057980
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.25032
Midterm postoperative results of mid-urethral slings. Role of ultrasound in explaining surgical failures
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with mid-urethral sling (MUS) is considered to have a high success rate. However, between 5% and 20% of MUS fail, with inadequate surgical implantation being a possible cause of SUI persistence or recurrence. Misplacement of a MUS can be determined by pelvic floor ultrasound (PF-US). The aim of this study was to investigate the role of PF-US in patients with persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after MUS surgery for SUI with a midterm follow-up.
Materials and methods: A historical cohort study including women undergoing MUS surgery for SUI between 2013 and 2015 was designed. The primary outcome was to correlate the sonographic parameters of MUS with SUI cure (negative International Continence Society-Uniform Cough Stress Test, Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form < 5 points and no symptoms of SUI), at 5 years postsurgery. Secondary outcomes were changes of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) at 1 and 5 years after surgery.
Results: Eighty-seven patients (80 transobturator-MUS, 7 retropubic-MUS) were included. At 5 years all patients referred improvement of UI and objective cure of SUI was demonstrated in 81.2%. The MUS was sonographically correct in 67 (98.5%) of the 68 patients with cure of SUI. The MUS was considered incorrectly placed in only 4 (28.6%) of the 14 patients with noncured SUI. MUCP decreased from 61.9 to 48.8 cmH2 O at 5 years of follow-up (p < 0.01) and up to 53% of women had UUI symptoms after surgery, with a nonsignificant decrease compared to baseline.
Conclusion: Patients cured of SUI had sonographically correct MUS by PF-US. Less than one-third of cases of SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS surgery could be explained by a sonographically incorrect sling. Low urethral resistance and/or UUI symptoms could help to explain the remaining failures. Complete functional and anatomic studies, including urodynamics and PF-US, should be performed before deciding on the next management strategy in patients with SUI persistence or recurrence after MUS.
Keywords: mid-urethral sling; persistent stress urinary incontinence; recurrent stress urinary incontinence; stress urinary incontinence; ultrasound; urethral profile.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Readjustable Sling in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence and Hypomobile Urethra: Understanding the Mechanisms of Closure by Transperineal Ultrasound.J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Dec;41(12):3069-3078. doi: 10.1002/jum.16076. Epub 2022 Aug 4. J Ultrasound Med. 2022. PMID: 36044020
-
Long-term efficacy and complications of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings: a prospective observational study.BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2191-2199. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16899. Epub 2021 Oct 6. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 34478604 Clinical Trial.
-
[Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery].Ceska Gynekol. 2017 Winter;82(1):59-64. Ceska Gynekol. 2017. PMID: 28252312 Review. Czech.
-
Influence of anterior vaginal mesh with concomitant mid-urethral sling surgery on stress urinary incontinence: clinical and sonographic outcome.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Dec;55(6):593-600. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12397. Epub 2015 Aug 24. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015. PMID: 26299981
-
Predictors and outcomes of Mid-urethral sling continence surgeries for stress urinary incontinence among Taiwanese women: What works best?Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov;63(6):826-835. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2024.07.016. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39481988 Review.
Cited by
-
Sonography as a Diagnostic Tool in Midurethral Sling Complications: A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 18;13(8):2336. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082336. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38673609 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transvaginal Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Sling in the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence.Cureus. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):e76480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76480. eCollection 2024 Dec. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39867092 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Ultrasound Predictors of Treatment Failure after 24 Months of Transobturator Midurethral Sling.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jul;36(7):1509-1516. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06179-x. Epub 2025 May 23. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 40407863
References
REFERENCES
-
- Steele SE, Hill AJ, Unger CA. Concurrent midurethral sling excision or lysis at the time of repeat sling for treatment of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(2):285-290. doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3385-5
-
- Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1(7):CD006375. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3
-
- Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Lee J. Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):149-155. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-1020-9
-
- Kociszewski J, Rautenberg O, Perucchini D, et al. Tape functionality: sonographic tape characteristics and outcome after TVT incontinence surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):485-490. doi:10.1002/nau.20556
-
- Hegde A, Nogueiras M, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Dynamic assessment of sling function on transperineal ultrasound: does it correlate with outcomes 1 year following surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(6):857-864. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3234-y
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials