Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 19:12:990842.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990842. eCollection 2022.

Monocytes acquire prostate cancer specific chromatin conformations upon indirect co-culture with prostate cancer cells

Affiliations

Monocytes acquire prostate cancer specific chromatin conformations upon indirect co-culture with prostate cancer cells

Heba Alshaker et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional chromosome loop conformations are powerful regulators of gene expression. These chromosome conformations can be detected both in tumour and in circulating cells and have significant disease biomarker potential. We have recently detected specific chromosome conformations in circulating cells of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) which were similar to ones found in their primary tumours, however, the possibility of horizontal transfer of chromosome conformations was not studied previously.

Methods: Human monocytes (U937) were co-cultured in Boyden chambers through 0.4 uM membrane with or without PC-3 human PCa cells or their conditioned media and a custom DNA microarray for 900,000 chromosomal loops covering all coding loci and non-coding RNA genes was performed on each part of the co-culture system.

Results: We have detected 684 PC-3 cell-specific chromosome conformations across the whole genome that were absent in naïve monocytes but appeared in monocytes co-cultured with PC-3 cells or with PC-3-conditioned media. Comparing PC3-specific conformations to the ones we have previously detected in systemic circulation of high-risk PCa patients revealed 9 positive loops present in both settings.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate for the first time a proof of concept for horizontal transfer of chromosome conformations without direct cell-cell contact. This carries high clinical relevance as we have previously observed chromatin conformations in circulating cells of patients with melanoma and PCa similar to ones in their primary tumours. These changes can be used as highly specific biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. Further studies are required to elucidate the specific mechanism of chromosome conformations transfer and its clinical significance in particular diseases.

Keywords: 3C; blood test; horizontal gene transfer; nucleome; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EH, MS, AR, WW, JG and AA are employees of Oxford BioDynamics. AA and AR are company directors. Oxford BioDynamics holds patents on the EpiSwitch™ technology. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the transwell model and chromosomal conformation assay. (A) PC-3 cells were cultured at the bottom chamber for 48 hours, then U937 cells were placed in the top chamber and incubated for 24 hours. (B) Chromosome conformation assay: DNA is crosslinked, digested, ligated and new sequences (in places where loops were) are predicted using relevance machine vector. Loops presence is detected using DNA microarray (11).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principal component analysis for the CCSs distribution between samples. Principal component analysis for the CCSs in PC-3 (A) and U937 (B) before and after co-cultures demonstrating a change in CCSs distribution.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Venn diagrams of CCSs overlap between treatment groups and high-risk PCa patients. (A–D). Venn diagrams indicating the number of overlapping CCSs between various groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Frazer KA, Murray SS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits. Nat Rev Genet (2009) 10(4):241–51. doi: 10.1038/nrg2554"10.1038/nrg2554 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulz WA, Elo JP, Florl AR, Pennanen S, Santourlidis S, Engers R, et al. . Genomewide DNA hypomethylation is associated with alterations on chromosome 8 in prostate carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2002) 35(1):58–65. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10092"10.1002/gcc.10092 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yegnasubramanian S, Kowalski J, Gonzalgo ML, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Walsh PC, et al. . Hypermethylation of CpG islands in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. Cancer Res (2004) 64(6):1975–86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3972 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Tu SW, Hsieh JT. Down-regulation of human DAB2IP gene expression mediated by polycomb Ezh2 complex and histone deacetylase in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem (2005) 280(23):22437–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501379200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iljin K, Wolf M, Edgren H, Gupta S, Kilpinen S, Skotheim RI, et al. . TMPRSS2 fusions with oncogenic ETS factors in prostate cancer involve unbalanced genomic rearrangements and are associated with HDAC1 and epigenetic reprogramming. Cancer Res (2006) 66(21):10242–6. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1986 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources