Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 18:12:943154.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943154. eCollection 2022.

Comparative review of pharmacological therapies in individuals with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with focus on hormone receptor subgroups

Affiliations
Review

Comparative review of pharmacological therapies in individuals with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with focus on hormone receptor subgroups

Chinyereugo M Umemneku-Chikere et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Breast cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of targeted therapies in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) have provided an evidence base for regulatory and reimbursement agencies to appraise the use of cancer therapies in clinical practice. However, a subset of these patients harbor additional biomarkers, for example, a positive hormone receptor status that may be more amenable to therapy and improve overall survival (OS). This review seeks to explore the reporting of evidence for treatment effects by the hormone receptor status using the RCT evidence of targeted therapies for HER2-positive ABC patients. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify published RCTs. Extracted data were synthesized using network meta-analysis to obtain the relative effects of HER2-positive-targeted therapies. We identified a gap in the reporting of the effectiveness of therapies by the hormone receptor status as only 15 out of 42 identified RCTs reported hormone receptor subgroup analyses; the majority of which reported progression-free survival but not OS or the overall response rate. In conclusion, we recommend that future trials in ABC should report the effect of cancer therapies in hormone receptor subgroups for all outcomes.

Keywords: Advanced breast cancer; HER2 positive; hormone receptor; metastatic breast cancer; network meta-analysis; subgroup analysis; targeted therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SB is a member of the NICE Decision Support Unit. She served as a paid consultant, providing unrelated methodological advice to the NICE, pharmaceutical industry and consultancy companies. She received payments for educational events from Roche and has received research funding from European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association (EFPAI) and Johnson and Johnson. RO is a member of the National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisal committee, member of the NICE Decision Support Unit (DSU), and associate member of the NICE Technical Support Unit (TSU). She has served as a paid consultant to the pharmaceutical industry, providing unrelated methodological advice. She reports teaching fees from the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the University of Bristol. KA is a member of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Diagnostics Advisory Committee and is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Emeritus. He has acted as a paid consultant, providing unrelated methodological and strategic advice, to the pharmaceutical and life sciences industry generally, as well as to UK Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC)/NICE, and has received unrelated research funding from; Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), Pfizer, Sanofi and Swiss Precision Diagnostics. He has also received course fees from ABPI and is a Partner/Director of Visible Analytics Limited. SK is supported by a NIHR academic Clinical Lecturer award and has no conflicts of interest to declare. MS is a member of a research funding panel for the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), and collaborates with the NICE Decision Support Unit (DSU). She has served as a paid consultant to the pharmaceutical and life sciences industry generally, as well as to DHSC/NICE, providing unrelated methodological advice. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network plots of identified trials (reporting PFS), with colors in the circles representing the proportion of patients in each RCT that are HR+ve (orange), HR-ve (green), unknown (blue), not reported (grey), and the middle purple circle indicated RCTs reporting subgroup analyses. PHC, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine; PC, physician choice; LC, lapatinib + capecitabine; TDM1, trastuzumab emtansine; C, capecitabine; PYC, pyrotinib + capecitabine; LV, lapatinib + vinorelbine; HC, trastuzumab + capecitabine; N, neratinib; TDM1AZ, trastuzumab emtansine + atezolizumab; NX, neratinib + taxane; X, taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel);NC, neratinib + capecitabine; HX, trastuzumab + taxane; HXB, trastuzumab + taxane + bevacizumab; LX, lapatinib + taxane; HV, trastuzumab + vinorelbine; HXE, trastuzumab + taxane + everolimus; PHX, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane; HXC, trastuzumab + capecitabine + taxane; AfV, afatinib + vinorelbine; HEV, trastuzumab + everolimus + vinorelbine; HXCb, trastuzumab + taxane + carboplatin; PTDM1, pertuzumab + trastuzumab emtansine; Chemo, standard chemotherapy; LH, lapatinib + trastuzumab; L, lapatinib; AI, aromatase inhibitors (letrozole or anastrozole); LAI, lapatinib + AI; FAI, fulverstrant + AI; HAI, trastuzumab +AI; PHAI, pertuzumab + trastuzumab +AI; HAb, trastuzumab + abemaciclib; HAbF, trastuzumab + abemaciclib + fulverstrant; HXNPLD, trastuzumab + taxane + NPLD; NPLD, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; HChemo, trastuzumab + chemotherapy; Eb, eribulin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Summary forest plots obtained from the NMA including all RCTs for PFS. PHC, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine; PC, physician choice; LC, lapatinib + capecitabine; TDM1, trastuzumab emtansine; C, capecitabine; PYC, pyrotinib + capecitabine; LV, lapatinib + vinorelbine; HC, trastuzumab + capecitabine; N, neratinib; TDM1AZ, trastuzumab emtansine + atezolizumab; NX, neratinib + taxane; X, taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel);NC, neratinib + capecitabine; HX, trastuzumab + taxane; HXB, trastuzumab + taxane + bevacizumab; LX, lapatinib + taxane; HV, trastuzumab + vinorelbine; HXE, trastuzumab + taxane + everolimus; PHX, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane; HXC, trastuzumab + capecitabine + taxane; AfV, afatinib + vinorelbine; HEV, trastuzumab + everolimus + vinorelbine; HXCb, trastuzumab + taxane + carboplatin; PTDM1, pertuzumab + trastuzumab emtansine; Chemo, standard chemotherapy; LH, lapatinib + trastuzumab; L, lapatinib; AI, aromatase inhibitors (letrozole or anastrozole); LAI, lapatinib + AI; FAI, fulverstrant + AI; HAI, trastuzumab +AI; PHAI, pertuzumab + trastuzumab +AI; HAb, trastuzumab + abemaciclib; HAbF, trastuzumab + abemaciclib + fulverstrant; HXNPLD, trastuzumab + taxane + NPLD; NPLD, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; HChemo, trastuzumab + chemotherapy; Eb, eribulin. Treatment effects are considered to be statistically significance if the 95% credible interval does not include the point of no difference which, 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Network plot of hormone receptors subgroup RCTs (reporting PFS). PHC, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine; PC, physician choice; LC, lapatinib + capecitabine; TDM1, trastuzumab emtansine; C, capecitabine; PYC, pyrotinib + capecitabine; HC, trastuzumab + capecitabine; TDM1AZ, trastuzumab emtansine + atezolizumab; HX, trastuzumab + taxane; HXB, trastuzumab + taxane + bevacizumab; LX, lapatinib + taxane; HV, trastuzumab + vinorelbine; HXE, trastuzumab + taxane + everolimus; PHX, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane; AfV, afatinib + vinorelbine; HEV, trastuzumab + everolimus + vinorelbine; HXNPLD, trastuzumab + taxane + NPLD; NPLD, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparative summary forest plots of treatment effects obtained from the HX connected network for PFS. PC, physician choice; LC, lapatinib + capecitabine; TDM1, trastuzumab emtansine; TDM1AZ, trastuzumab emtansine + atezolizumab; HX, trastuzumab + taxane; HXB, trastuzumab + taxane + bevacizumab; LX, lapatinib + taxane; HV, trastuzumab + vinorelbine; HXE, trastuzumab + taxane + everolimus; PHX, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane; AfV, afatinib + vinorelbine; HEV, trastuzumab + everolimus + vinorelbine; HXNPLD, trastuzumab + taxane + NPLD; NPLD, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparative summary forest plots of treatment effects obtained from capecitabine connected network for PFS. PHC, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + capecitabine; LC, lapatinib + capecitabine; C, capecitabine; PYC, pyrotinib + capecitabine; HC, trastuzumab + capecitabine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin (2021) 71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park Y, Senkus-Konefka E, Im S-A, Pentheroudakis G, Saji S, Gupta S, et al. . Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with early breast cancer: A KSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, ISMPO, JSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol (2020) 31(4):451–69. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cesca MG, Vian L, Cristóvão-Ferreira S, Pondé N, de Azambuja E. HER2-positive advanced breast cancer treatment in 2020. Cancer Treat Rev (2020) 88:102033. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilcken N, Zdenkowski N, White M, Snyder R, Pittman K, Mainwaring P, et al. . Systemic treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol (2014) 10 Suppl S4:1–14. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12206 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bai X, Lin X, Song J, Chang JH, Han LL, Fan C. Incidence of central nervous system metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab: A meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) (2021) 76:e2653. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2653 - DOI - PMC - PubMed