A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability
- PMID: 36060788
- PMCID: PMC9428492
- DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.938481
A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability
Abstract
Preventing degradation, facilitating restoration, and maintaining soil health is fundamental for achieving ecosystem stability and resilience. A healthy soil ecosystem is supported by favorable components in the soil that promote biological productivity and provide ecosystem services. Bio-indicators of soil health are measurable properties that define the biotic components in soil and could potentially be used as a metric in determining soil functionality over a wide range of ecological conditions. However, it has been a challenge to determine effective bio-indicators of soil health due to its temporal and spatial resolutions at ecosystem levels. The objective of this review is to compile a set of effective bio-indicators for developing a better understanding of ecosystem restoration capabilities. It addresses a set of potential bio-indicators including microbial biomass, respiration, enzymatic activity, molecular gene markers, microbial metabolic substances, and microbial community analysis that have been responsive to a wide range of ecosystem functions in agricultural soils, mine deposited soil, heavy metal contaminated soil, desert soil, radioactive polluted soil, pesticide polluted soil, and wetland soils. The importance of ecosystem restoration in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals was also discussed. This review identifies key management strategies that can help in ecosystem restoration and maintain ecosystem stability.
Keywords: bio-indicators; ecosystem restoration; ecosystem stability; molecular bio-indicators; resilience and resistance; soil health.
Copyright © 2022 Bhaduri, Sihi, Bhowmik, Verma, Munda and Dari.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the review was drafted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abreu Z., Llambí L. D., Sarmiento L. (2009). Sensitivity of soil restoration indicators during páramo succession in the high tropical andes: chronosequence and permanent plot approaches. Resto. Eco. 17, 619–627. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00406.x - DOI
-
- Achat D. L., Morel C., Bakker M. R., Augusto L., Pellerin S., Gallet-Budynek A., et al. . (2010). Assessing turnover of microbial biomass phosphorus: combination of an isotopic dilution method with a mass balance model. Soil Bio. Biochem. 42, 2231–2240. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.023 - DOI
-
- Acton D. F., Gregorich L. J. (eds.) (1995). The Health of Our Soils Toward Sustainable Agriculture in Canada Cat no. A53-1906/1995EISBN0-660-15947-3.
-
- Ai C., Liang G., Sun J., Wang X., He P., Zhou W., et al. . (2013). Different roles of rhizosphere effect and long-term fertilization in the activity and community structure of ammonia oxidizers in a calcareous fluvo-aquic soil. Soil Bio. Biochem. 57, 30–42. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.003 - DOI
-
- Ajayi A. E., Horn R. (2017). Biochar-induced changes in soil resilience: effects of soil texture and biochar dosage. Pedosphere 27, 236–247. 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60313-8 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
