Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 17:10:888708.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.888708. eCollection 2022.

Perceptions of and challenges faced by primary healthcare workers about preconception services in rural India: A qualitative study using focus group discussion

Affiliations

Perceptions of and challenges faced by primary healthcare workers about preconception services in rural India: A qualitative study using focus group discussion

Amruta Paresh Chutke et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Providing preconception care through healthcare workers at the primary health care level is a crucial intervention to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes, consequently reducing neonatal mortality. Despite the availability of evidence, this window of opportunity remains unaddressed in many countries, including India. The public health care system is primarily accessed by rural and tribal Indian population. It is essential to know the frontline healthcare workers perception about preconception care. The study aimed to identify barriers and suggestions for framing appropriate strategies for implementing preconception care through primary health centers.

Methods: The authors conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs) with 45 healthcare workers in four FGDs (8-14 participants in each), in four blocks of Nashik district. The transcribed discussions were analyzed in MAXQDA software using the Socio-Ecological Model as an initial coding guide, including four levels of factors (individual, interpersonal, community, and institutional) that influenced an individual's behavior to use preconception care services.

Results: Healthcare workers had some knowledge about preconception care, limited to adolescent health and family planning services. The interpersonal factors included heavy workload, stress, lack of support and co-operation, and paucity of appreciation, and motivation. The perceived community factors included poverty, migration, poor knowledge of preconception care, lack of felt need for preconception services, the influence of older women in the household decision, low male involvement, myths and misconceptions regarding preconception services. The identified institutional factors were lack of human resources, specialized services, logistics, and challenges in delivering adolescent health and family planning programs. Healthcare workers suggested the need for program-specific guidelines, training and capacity building of human resources, an un-interrupted supply of logistics, and a unique community awareness drive supporting preconception care services.

Conclusion: Multi-level factors of the Socio-Ecological Model influencing the preconception care services should be considered for framing strategies in the implementation of comprehensive preconception care as a part of a continuum of care for life cycle phases of women.

Keywords: Socio-Ecological Model; challenges; focus group discussion; healthcare workers; preconception care; qualitative research; suggestions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of India showing the location of the study area, 2018-19. (A) India showing the location of selected Nashik district, State Maharashtra (B) Nashik district with selected study blocks. Source: Maps of India freely available and accessible at www.mapsofindia.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual framework of a model for preconception care services.

References

    1. Dean SV, Lassi ZS, Imam AM, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: closing the gap in the continuum of care to accelerate improvements in maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. (2014) 11:S1. 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freda MC, Moos MK, Curtis M. The history of preconception care: evolving guidelines and standards. Matern Child Health J. (2006) 10:43–52. 10.1007/s10995-006-0087-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korenbrot CC, Steinberg A, Bender C, Newberry S. Preconception care: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. (2002) 6:75–88. 10.1023/A:1015460106832 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitworth M, Dowswell T. Routine pre-pregnancy health promotion for improving pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev. (2009) 4:536. 10.1002/14651858.CD007536 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goossens J, De Roose M, Van Hecke A, Goemaes R, Verhaeghe S, Beeckman D. Barriers and facilitators to the provision of preconception care by healthcare providers: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. (2018) 87:113–30. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types