Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 25:2022:1895498.
doi: 10.1155/2022/1895498. eCollection 2022.

Influence of Preoperative Foveal Layers' Thickness on Visual Function and Macular Morphology by Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane

Affiliations

Influence of Preoperative Foveal Layers' Thickness on Visual Function and Macular Morphology by Phacovitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane

R Zhmurin et al. J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this retrospective study with short, differently dispersed follow-up is to record the relationships between the pathologies of the individual foveal layers, measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and to investigate their influence on pre- and postoperative best-corrected decimal far visual acuity (BCVA) by phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM) in comorbidity with cataract. Patients and Methods. 208 eyes of 173 patients with symptomatic idiopathic ERM and moderate cataract were included.

Results: In all OCT morphological stages of ERM, as well as in their combination with macular lamellar hole (MLH) and vitreomacular traction (VMT), a significant difference in the thickness of the individual fovea layers was found. In addition, the entire fovea thickening led to the proportional thickening of the individual fovea layers (p < 0.001). The larger the central foveolar (CFT, R 2 = -0.238, p=0.002), maximum foveal (MFT, R 2 = -0.267, p=0.001), and ONL thickness (R 2 = -0.16, p=0.044) were preoperatively, the worse the initial visual acuity was at all OCT stages of ERM. This was even more significant in the presence of a tractive component in the case of MLH or VMT (p < 0.001). In ERM without a traction component, only ONL thickening led to significant postoperative visual acuity reduction (R 2 = -0.163, p=0.047). The foveolar retinal thickening (CFT and MFT) of the pure ERM is directly associated with distortion of the retinal layers (R 2 = 0.292, p < 0.001 and R 2 = 0.287, p < 0.001) as well as with separation of the ERM (R 2 = 0.168, p=0.034 and R 2 = 0.187, p=0.018). When ERM was combined with tractive component, CFT, ONL, and INL thickness correlated (positively) with the integrity of ellipsoid zone (R 2 = 0.342, p < 0.05) and external limiting membrane (R 2 = 0.548, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: ONL thickening in ERM without a tractive component serves as a limited prognostic factor of postoperative visual acuity decrease. The preoperative BCVA in the groups of ERM with traction component showed significant correlation with CFT as well as with the thickness of individual foveal layers. VMT in ERM correlates with the disintegration of the ellipsoid zone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this article did not receive any financial support directly or indirectly during the research process. They declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measurement of the fovea layers in the central OCT incision in the patient's eye of Group 3. Central foveolar retinal thickness (CFT) from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to the inner limiting membrane (ILM). CONLT/CINLT: central foveolar thickness of the outer and inner nuclear layer. CIPLT: central foveolar thickness of the inner plexiform layer. MFT: maximum foveal retinal thickness at the thickest fovea range from RPE to ILM. OCT morphological properties of the fovea layers: 1—intact RPE, 2—interrupted junction between the outer and inner photoreceptor segments (blurred ellipsoid zone), 3—intact integrity of the external limiting membrane, 4—distortion of the retinal layers, 5—adherent epiretinal membrane, and 6—elevation of the foveola with an ectopy of INL and IPL.

References

    1. Haritoglou C., Schumann R. G., Wolf A. Epiretinal gliosis. Ophthalmologe Der . 2014;111(5):485–497. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3040-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein R., Klein B. E., Wang Q., Moss S. E. The epidemiology of epiretinal membranes. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society . 1994;92 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kofod M., la Cour M. Quantification of retinal tangential movement in epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology . 2012;119(9) doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oster S. F., Mojana F., Brar M., Yuson R. M. S., Cheng L., Freeman W. R. Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment layer on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography is a predictor of poor visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membranes. Retina . 2010;30(5):713–718. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c596e3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ichikawa Y., Imamura Y., Ishida M. Inner nuclear layer thickness, a biomarker of metamorphopsia in epiretinal membrane, correlates with tangential retinal displacement. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 2018 Sep;193:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.06.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources