Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):742.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06681-3.

Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse

Lucy Dwyer  1 , Carol Bugge  2 , Suzanne Hagen  3 , Kirsteen Goodman  3 , Wael Agur  4   5 , Melanie Dembinsky  2 , Margaret Graham  6 , Karen Guerrero  7 , Christine Hemming  8 , Aethele Khunda  9 , Doreen McClurg  3 , Lynn Melone  3 , Ranee Thakar  10 , Rohna Kearney  11 ; TOPSY Team
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Theoretical and practical development of the TOPSY self-management intervention for women who use a vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse

Lucy Dwyer et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women, where the downward descent of pelvic organs into the vagina causes symptoms which impacts quality of life. Vaginal pessaries offer an effective alternative to surgery for the management of POP. However, the need for regular follow-up can be burdensome for women and requires significant healthcare resources. The TOPSY study is a randomised controlled trial which aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-management of vaginal pessaries. This paper describes the theoretical and practical development of the self-management intervention.

Methods: The intervention was developed using the MRC complex intervention framework, normalisation process theory (NPT) and self-management theory. The intervention aims to boost perceived self-efficacy in accordance with Bandura's social cognitive theory and is guided by the tasks and skills Lorig and Hollman describe as necessary to self-manage a health condition.

Results: The TOPSY intervention was designed to support women to undertake the medical management, role management and emotional management of their pessary. The six self-management skills described by Lorig and Hollman: problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilisation, formation of a patient-provider partnership role, action planning and self-tailoring, are discussed in detail, including how women were supported to achieve each task within the context of pessary self-management. The TOPSY intervention includes a self-management support session with a pessary practitioner trained in intervention delivery, a follow-up phone call 2 weeks later and ongoing telephone or face-to-face support as required by the woman initiated by contacting a member of the research team.

Conclusions: The TOPSY study intervention was developed utilising the findings from a prior service development project, intervention development and self-efficacy theory, relevant literature, clinician experience and feedback from pessary using women and members of the public. In 2022, the findings of the TOPSY study will provide further evidence to inform this important aspect of pessary management.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN62510577 . Registered on June 10, 2017.

Keywords: Intervention development; Pessary; Prolapse; Randomised controlled trial (RCT); Self-efficacy; Self-management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
TOPSY intervention development diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cundiff G. A survey of pessary use by members of the American Urogynecologic Society. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6):931-5. - PubMed
    1. Velzel J, Roovers JP, Van der Vaart CH, Broekman B, Vollebregt A, Hakvoort R. A nationwide survey concerning practices in pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse in the Netherlands: identifying needs for further research. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1453–1458. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2697-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geoffrion R, Zhang T, Lee T, Cundiff GW. Clinical characteristics associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(6):339–45. - PubMed
    1. Khaja A, Freeman RM. How often should shelf/Gellhorn pessaries be changed? A survey of IUGA urogynaecologists. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):941–6. - PubMed
    1. Bugge C, Hagen S, Thakar R. Vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a multiprofessional survey of practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24(6):1017–24. - PubMed

Publication types