Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 30:15:1851-1862.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S374887. eCollection 2022.

Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity: A Practical Approach

Affiliations
Review

Calcium Channel Blocker Toxicity: A Practical Approach

Omar A Alshaya et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. .

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely prescribed medications for various clinical indications in adults and children. They are available in both immediate and long-acting formulations and are generally classified into dihydropyridines and nondihydropyridines, with nondihydropyridines having more cardioselectivity. CCB toxicity is common given the widespread use which leads to serious adverse clinical outcomes, especially in children. Severe CCB toxicities may present with life-threatening bradycardia, hypotension, hyperglycemia, and renal insufficiency. Dihydropyridine toxicity, however, may present with reflex tachycardia instead of bradycardia. Initial patient evaluation and assessment are crucial to identify the severity of CCB toxicity and design the best management strategy. There are different strategies to overcome CCB toxicity that requires precise dosing and close monitoring in various patient populations. These strategies may include large volumes of IV fluids, calcium salts, high insulin euglycemia therapy (HIET), and vasopressors. We hereby summarize the evidence behind the management of CCB toxicity and present a practical guide for clinicians to overcome this common drug toxicity.

Keywords: calcium channel blockers; drug overdose; emergency medicine; poisoning; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work and no financial supports.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Algorithmic structure for managing patients with calcium channel blocker toxicity.

References

    1. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. J Hypertens. 2020;38(6):982–1004. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002453 - DOI - PubMed
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, et al. 2020 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 38th annual report. Clin Toxicol. 2021;59(12):1282–1501. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1989785 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christensen MB, Petersen KM, Bøgevig S, et al. Outcomes following calcium channel blocker exposures reported to a poison information center. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40360-018-0271-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakraborty RK, Hamilton RJ. Calcium channel blocker toxicity. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2018. - PubMed