Digital divide among individuals with acquired brain injury: a scoping review protocol
- PMID: 36065946
- DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00423
Digital divide among individuals with acquired brain injury: a scoping review protocol
Abstract
Objective: This scoping review will identify literature pertaining to individuals with an acquired brain injury and digital divide; specifically, examining personal access and use of internet-enabled information and communication technologies. The review will identify the information and communication technologies used by individuals with an acquired brain injury as well as the determinants of technology use. The review will also identify and create a taxonomy of information and communication technologies utilized in relation to cognitive and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with an acquired brain injury in community and outpatient settings.
Introduction: Internet-enabled technologies are increasingly central to all aspects of living, including health care and community participation; however, gaps in the access to and use of information and communication technologies among individuals with an acquired brain injury may limit the utility of a digitalized society.
Inclusion criteria: Studies that focus on access to or use of internet-enabled information and communication technologies among individuals with an acquired brain injury (including stroke, infection, tumor, disease, hypoxia, or traumatic brain injury) will be considered in this review.
Methods: Primary peer-reviewed studies published in English from 2001 onward will be considered for inclusion. Six electronic databases will be searched: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO. Gray literature searches for government and nongovernment organization reports and data, and dissertation theses will be conducted via advanced Google searches. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts of articles based on the "population, concept, context" inclusion criteria. Relevant data will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Copyright © 2022 JBI.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung Y-C, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2019;130(4):1080–1097.
-
- Ponsford JL, Downing M, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma 2014;31(1):64–77.
-
- Simpson GK, McRae P, Hallab L, Daher M, Strettles B. Participation in competitive employment after severe traumatic brain injury: new employment versus return to previous (pre-injury) employment. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020;30(6):995–1012.
-
- Tate RL, Lane-Brown AT, Myles BM, Cameron ID. A longitudinal study of support needs after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2020;34(8):991–1000.
-
- Bender A, Adrion C, Fischer L, Huber M, Jawny K, Straube A, et al. Long-term rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2016;113(38):634–641.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical