Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec;35(8):720-724.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00610-3. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

Restorative therapy clinical trials for erectile dysfunction: a scoping review of endpoint measures

Affiliations

Restorative therapy clinical trials for erectile dysfunction: a scoping review of endpoint measures

Russell G Saltzman et al. Int J Impot Res. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Given the lack of regulatory approval for restorative therapies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, we hypothesized that clinical trials would vary in methodology and endpoint measurements. Our objective was to analyze methodological approaches and outcome measures of clinical trials evaluating restorative therapies for erectile dysfunction. Data was extracted from clinicaltrials.gov on trials which contained the keywords "erectile dysfunction". We evaluated trials initiated between 2004 and 2021 which listed a restorative therapy intervention. We identified 95 trials investigating energy-based/shockwave therapies (60/95), stem cell therapies (25/95), platelet-based therapies (6/95), and others (4/95). Only 41.1% of the trials evaluated safety. The most common efficacy endpoint was International Index of Erectile Function and Sexual Health Inventory for Men, and only 29.5% utilized penile Doppler. Thirty (31.6%) trials had been completed yet only 3 (3.2%) have published results. We found substantial heterogeneity in methodological approach in the trials. Subjective measures of erectile function were commonly reported, but definitions of inclusion criteria and objective outcome measures were inconsistent. These results provide a basis for the design of future clinical trials to improve the quality of trial data and aid in the development of standardized criteria for erectile dysfunction clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Consensus development conference statement. National Institutes of Health. Impotence. December 7–9, 1992. Int J Impot Res. 1993;5:181–284.
    1. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI. Association of sexual problems with social, psychological, and physical problems in men and women: a cross sectional population survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:144–8. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Goldstein I, Goren A, Li VW, Tang WY, Hassan TA. Epidemiology update of erectile dysfunction in eight countries with high burden. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8:48–58. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Stein MJ, Lin H, Wang R. New advances in erectile technology. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6:15–24. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. McMahon CG. Current diagnosis and management of erectile dysfunction. Med J Aust. 2019;210:469–76. - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources