Natural History of Brachial Plexus, Peripheral Nerve, and Spinal Schwannomas
- PMID: 36069570
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002118
Natural History of Brachial Plexus, Peripheral Nerve, and Spinal Schwannomas
Abstract
Background: Management of sporadic schwannomas is often dictated by a patient's clinical presentation and the tumor's behavior. For patients who are managed nonsurgically, there are little data available about the expected natural history.
Objective: To evaluate the natural history and growth patterns of extracranial schwannomas including tumors of the distal peripheral nerves, spine, and brachial plexus.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with nonsyndromic extracranial schwannomas at a single tertiary care institution diagnosed between 2002 and 2019. Patient data and tumor characteristics including volume were recorded.
Results: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were identified (mean age 51 years, 42% male, average of 27.8-month follow-up). Tumor location was distal peripheral nerve in 82, brachial plexus in 36, and paraspinal in 109. At the time of diagnosis, peripheral lesions were significantly larger than spinal (59 m 3 vs 13 cm 3 ) and brachial plexus lesions (15 cm 3 ). Distinct growth patterns were seen with both distal peripheral nerve and spinal lesions; 34/82 peripheral nerve lesions had fast growth (β = 0.176%/day), and 48 had slow growth (β = 0.021%/day; P < .01). Spinal schwannomas similarly had 30 fast-growing (β = 0.229%/day), 16 moderate-growing (β = 0.071%/day), and 63 slow-growing (β = 0.022%/day; P = .03) subtypes. The brachial plexus had relatively homogeneous growth patterns (β = 0.065%/day). Females had 2.9 times greater odds of having the fast-growing subtype.
Conclusion: Distinct growth patterns were seen in extracranial sporadic schwannomas based on tumor location and patient demographics. Fast (>80% volume change per year) vs slow (5%-10% per year) tumor growth can often be ascertained within 2 follow-up images. Awareness of these patterns might have implications for patient counseling and therapeutic decision-making.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Natural History of Brachial Plexus, Peripheral Nerve, and Spinal Schwannomas.Neurosurgery. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):e151-e152. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002131. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Neurosurgery. 2022. PMID: 36083176 No abstract available.
References
-
- Antonescu CR, Perry A, Woodruff JM. Schwannoma (including variants). In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 4th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013:170-172.
-
- Hilton DA, Hanemann CO. Schwannomas and their pathogenesis. Brain Pathol. 2014;24(3):205-220.
-
- Tish S, Habboub G, Lang M, et al. The epidemiology of spinal schwannoma in the United States between 2006 and 2014. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32(5):661-666.
-
- Sandberg K, Nilsson J, Søe Nielsen N, Dahlin LB. Tumours of peripheral nerves in the upper extremity: a 22-year epidemiological study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(1):43-49.
-
- Guha D, Davidson B, Nadi M, et al. Management of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: 17 years of experience at Toronto Western Hospital. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(4):1226-1234.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical