Vertebral body tethering for non-idiopathic scoliosis: initial results from a multicenter retrospective study
- PMID: 36070136
- DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00575-9
Vertebral body tethering for non-idiopathic scoliosis: initial results from a multicenter retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been described for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Results of the technique for non-idiopathic scoliosis have not yet been reported.
Methods: An international multicenter registry was retrospectively queried for non-idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with minimum 2-year follow-up. Success at 2 years was defined as Cobb angle < 35 degrees and no fusion surgery.
Results: Of the 251 patients treated with VBT, 20 had non-idiopathic scoliosis and minimum 2-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 12.4 years (range 10 to 17 years). Mean major Cobb angle at enrollment was 56 degrees. Of those, 18 patients had a major thoracic curve and two had a major lumbar curve. Of the 20 patients, nine met criteria for success (45%). Eight of the 20 patients had poor outcomes (four fusions, four with curve > 50 degrees). Success was associated with smaller preoperative Cobb angle (50 vs. 62 degrees, p = 0.01) and smaller Cobb angle on initial postop imaging (28 degrees vs. 46 degrees, p = 0.0007). All patients with Cobb angle < 35 degrees on 1st postop imaging had a successful result, with the exception of one patient who overcorrected and required fusion. Syndromic vs. neuromuscular patients had a higher likelihood of success (5 of 7, 71%, 2 of 10, 20%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Selected non-idiopathic scoliosis can be successfully treated with VBT, but failure rates are high and were associated with large curves, inadequate intraoperative correction and neuromuscular diagnosis. Achieving a Cobb angle less than 35 degrees on 1st standing radiograph was associated with a successful outcome which was achieved in 45% of patients.
Level of evidence: Level IV (retrospective review study).
Keywords: AVBT; Cerebral palsy; Chiari malformation; Congenital scoliosis; Growth modulation; Scoliosis; Syndromic scoliosis.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.
References
-
- Malfair D, Flemming AK, Dvorak MF et al (2010) Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3 suppl):S8–S22 - DOI
-
- Weinstein SL (1999) Natural history. Spine 24(24):2592–2600 - DOI
-
- Aubin CE, Clin J, Rawlinson J (2018) Biomechanical simulations of costo-vertebral and anterior vertebral body tethers for the fusionless treatment of pediatric scoliosis. J Orthop Res 36(1):254–264
-
- Cassar-Pullicino VN, Eisenstein SM (2002) Imaging in scoliosis: what, why and how? Clin Radiol 57(7):543–562 - DOI
-
- Newton PO, Kluck DG, Saito W et al (2018) Anterior spinal growth tethering for skeletally immature patients with scoliosis: a retrospective look two to four years postoperatively. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100(19):1691–1697 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous