Use of the endometrial receptivity array to guide personalized embryo transfer after a failed transfer attempt was associated with a lower cumulative and per transfer live birth rate during donor and autologous cycles
- PMID: 36070983
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.007
Use of the endometrial receptivity array to guide personalized embryo transfer after a failed transfer attempt was associated with a lower cumulative and per transfer live birth rate during donor and autologous cycles
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) guided by endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test improves reproductive outcomes for fresh embryo transfers (fsETs) or frozen embryo transfers (FETs) during autologous and donor cycles.
Design: A retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study.
Setting: University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.
Patient(s): The study included patients with a single previous failed transfer and yielded 3,239 autologous transfers and 2,133 donor transfers. Among autologous transfers, 255 were pET guided by ERA; among unguided autologous transfers, 1,122 and 1,862 transfers involved fresh or previously frozen embryos, respectively. Among donor transfers, 319 were ERA-guided; among unguided donor transfers, 1,175 and 639 involved fsETs or FETs, respectively.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Primary outcomes were live birth rate per embryo transfer and cumulative live birth rate on consecutive transfers until live birth or cessation of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were implantation, pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer, and miscarriage rate per pregnancy.
Result(s): During both autologous or donor transfers, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate were higher in FET and fsET than in pET groups, even with euploid transfers. Logistic regression analysis, considering possible confounders, indicated patients receiving pET had poorer outcomes than those undergoing FET and fsET in autologous and donor cycles. Implantation, pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy rates were lower in patients undergoing pET.
Conclusion(s): Using ERA to guide pET during either autologous or donor cycles after a failed transfer attempt did not improve reproductive outcomes. Conversely, worse outcomes were detected when ERA was used.
Keywords: ERA test; cumulative live birth; donor cycles; endometrium; fresh embryo transfer; infertility; pET; personalized embryo transfer; precision medicine.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
End of an endometrial receptivity array?Fertil Steril. 2022 Oct;118(4):737. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.031. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Fertil Steril. 2022. PMID: 36075744 No abstract available.
-
Two studies in the same center, on the same patient population and topic, but with different results: Is the experimental design to blame?Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar;119(3):514-515. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.019. Epub 2022 Dec 1. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 36462548 No abstract available.
-
Reply of the Authors: Not in the same patient population but on the same topic. The endometrial receptivity array test has not proven clinically useful to improve implantation yet, and our data support this fact.Fertil Steril. 2023 Mar;119(3):516-517. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.029. Epub 2022 Dec 22. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID: 36565975 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources