The agreement and repeatability of measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion and poplietal angle in healthy adolescents
- PMID: 36071503
- PMCID: PMC9450273
- DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00572-1
The agreement and repeatability of measurements of ankle joint dorsiflexion and poplietal angle in healthy adolescents
Abstract
Background: The intra-rater repeatability and inter-rater agreement of orthopaedics measurements are important for estimating injury risk and appropriate treatment. In clinical practice, it is often unavoidable to trust the measurements of other health professionals.
Methods: This study tested the agreement and repeatability of measurements of the dorsiflexion of the foot, dorsiflexion with 90-degrees knee flexion, and popliteal angle test in healthy adolescents performed twice by three raters differing in clinical experience. Three raters, i.e., an orthopaedics specialist (16 years of experience), a resident medical doctor in orthopaedics (4 years of experience), and a physiotherapy student (1 year of experience) measured the ankle joint dorsiflexion and the popliteal angle in 142 healthy adolescent subjects.
Results: The student outperformed more experienced raters by displaying good repeatability for all the evaluated parameters. The orthopaedics specialist failed to replicate the measurements of the left ankle joint passive dorsiflexion and the left popliteal angle. The medical resident in orthopaedics displayed a lack of repeatability in evaluating the right ankle joint dorsiflexion with the knee joint bent. Kendall's W value for all parameters ranged 0.66-0.78, indicating a good inter-rater agreement.
Conclusions: The study highlights that measurements of the ankle joint dorsiflexion and popliteal angle test by different health professionals can generally be trusted. It indicates that novice health professionals could potentially evaluate such parameters in healthy subjects without a quality loss.
Keywords: Agreement; Ankle joint dorsiflexion; Goniometry; Popliteal angle test; Reliability.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The influence of gender and sport on popliteal angle and dorsiflexion in junior high school students.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 19;25(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07429-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38764029 Free PMC article.
-
Flexibility does not affect the dorsiflexion of foot and the popliteal angle in young adults.Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Oct;26(7):763-765. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 16. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020. PMID: 31668802
-
Comparison of Functional Ankle Motion Measures in Modern Dancers.J Dance Med Sci. 2012 Sep;16(3):116-25. J Dance Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 26730940
-
Validity and reliability of a new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013 Aug;37(4):289-97. doi: 10.1177/0309364612465886. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013. PMID: 23211471
-
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814597 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of gender and sport on popliteal angle and dorsiflexion in junior high school students.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 19;25(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07429-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 38764029 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of an Acrobatics-Based Curriculum on Motor Fitness in Adolescents.Life (Basel). 2025 May 13;15(5):778. doi: 10.3390/life15050778. Life (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40430205 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kalisch BJ, Aebersold M. Interruptions and multitasking in nursing care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:126–132. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources