Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;22(3):362-369.
doi: 10.18295/squmj.8.2021.114. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

Can Medical Students Evaluate Medical Websites?: A mixed-methods study from Oman

Affiliations

Can Medical Students Evaluate Medical Websites?: A mixed-methods study from Oman

Teresa Loda et al. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to discover the extent to which medical students can evaluate medical websites, evaluation criteria used, factors affecting their abilities and whether a teaching intervention could rectify problems. Medical students and practitioners are required to evaluate medical information available on the Internet. Most current medical students are familiar with the Internet, but their ability to evaluate material may require improvement.

Methods: A class of undergraduate medical students evaluated an unreliable medical website, received a teaching intervention on website evaluation criteria and re-evaluated the same site. This mixed-methods study was conducted at Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, from September to December 2018.

Results: A total of 149 (response rate: 82.3%) students participated. Students spent, on average, 4.69 hours per day on the Internet. No significant correlations were found between demographic indicators and Internet time. On a 10-point Likert scale, students' scores ranged from 5-6, with no significant differences between the pre- and post-intervention evaluations, except for increased polarisation away from the mean. Qualitative comments indicated an awareness of relevant criteria but an overall inability to critically apply them.

Conclusion: The results indicate that one cannot make a blanket statement about medical students' ability to evaluate medical websites despite their familiarity with technology. Moreover, website evaluation should be viewed primarily from the information perspective and that critical thinking ability may play a major role. Due to these overriding factors, short interventions are unlikely to have an impact, and other educational strategies should be developed. These are necessary to ensure that medical students can function independently as life-long learners and medical professionals.

Keywords: Internet; Medical Students; Oman.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre-and post-intervention distribution of scores on students evaluating a medical website.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Masters K. Access to and use of the internet by South African general practitioners. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:778–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Masters K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the internet: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients’ and physicians’ perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moick M, Terlutter R. Physicians’ motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior. Med 2 0. 2012;1:e2. doi: 10.2196/med20.1996. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacLeod A, Fournier C. Residents’ use of mobile technologies: Three challenges for graduate medical education. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;3:99–105. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources