Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 22:4:937853.
doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.937853. eCollection 2022.

Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: A baseline comparator for genome editing

Affiliations
Review

Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: A baseline comparator for genome editing

Jorge Martínez-Fortún et al. Front Genome Ed. .

Abstract

Traditional breeding has successfully selected beneficial traits for food, feed, and fibre crops over the last several thousand years. The last century has seen significant technological advancements particularly in marker assisted selection and the generation of induced genetic variation, including over the last few decades, through mutation breeding, genetic modification, and genome editing. While regulatory frameworks for traditional varietal development and for genetic modification with transgenes are broadly established, those for genome editing are lacking or are still evolving in many regions. In particular, the lack of "foreign" recombinant DNA in genome edited plants and that the resulting SNPs or INDELs are indistinguishable from those seen in traditional breeding has challenged development of new legislation. Where products of genome editing and other novel breeding technologies possess no transgenes and could have been generated via traditional methods, we argue that it is logical and proportionate to apply equivalent legislative oversight that already exists for traditional breeding and novel foods. This review analyses the types and the scale of spontaneous and induced genetic variation that can be selected during traditional plant breeding activities. It provides a base line from which to judge whether genetic changes brought about by techniques of genome editing or other reverse genetic methods are indeed comparable to those routinely found using traditional methods of plant breeding.

Keywords: genetic variation; genetics; genome edited crops; mutation; plant breeding and biotechnology; precision-bred organisms; regulation; traditional breeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Diagram summarising the flowering plant life cycle showing breeding activities and sources of variation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representation of different site directed nuclease (SDN) genome editing approaches and the resulting changes to the host genome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelrahman M., Wei Z., Rohila J. S., Zhao K. (2021). Multiplex genome-editing technologies for revolutionizing plant biology and crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 721203. 10.3389/fpls.2021.721203 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdoun F., Beddiaf M. (2002). [Cupressus dupreziana A. Camus: Distribution, decline and regeneration on the tassili n'Ajjer, central sahara]. C. R. Biol. 325, 617–627. 10.1016/s1631-0691(02)01433-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams K., Wendel J. (2005). Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8 (2), 135–141. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahloowalia B. S., Maluszynski M., Nichterlein K. (2004). Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135 (2), 187–204. Springer. 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x - DOI
    1. Ainley W. M., Sastry-Dent L., Welter M. E., Murray M. G., Zeitler B., Amora R., et al. (2013). Trait stacking via targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11 (9), 1126–1134. 10.1111/pbi.12107 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources