Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: A baseline comparator for genome editing
- PMID: 36072906
- PMCID: PMC9441798
- DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2022.937853
Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: A baseline comparator for genome editing
Abstract
Traditional breeding has successfully selected beneficial traits for food, feed, and fibre crops over the last several thousand years. The last century has seen significant technological advancements particularly in marker assisted selection and the generation of induced genetic variation, including over the last few decades, through mutation breeding, genetic modification, and genome editing. While regulatory frameworks for traditional varietal development and for genetic modification with transgenes are broadly established, those for genome editing are lacking or are still evolving in many regions. In particular, the lack of "foreign" recombinant DNA in genome edited plants and that the resulting SNPs or INDELs are indistinguishable from those seen in traditional breeding has challenged development of new legislation. Where products of genome editing and other novel breeding technologies possess no transgenes and could have been generated via traditional methods, we argue that it is logical and proportionate to apply equivalent legislative oversight that already exists for traditional breeding and novel foods. This review analyses the types and the scale of spontaneous and induced genetic variation that can be selected during traditional plant breeding activities. It provides a base line from which to judge whether genetic changes brought about by techniques of genome editing or other reverse genetic methods are indeed comparable to those routinely found using traditional methods of plant breeding.
Keywords: genetic variation; genetics; genome edited crops; mutation; plant breeding and biotechnology; precision-bred organisms; regulation; traditional breeding.
Copyright © 2022 Martínez-Fortún, Phillips and Jones.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Advances in Crop Breeding Through Precision Genome Editing.Front Genet. 2022 Jul 14;13:880195. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.880195. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35910205 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epigenomics in stress tolerance of plants under the climate change.Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Jul;50(7):6201-6216. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08539-6. Epub 2023 Jun 9. Mol Biol Rep. 2023. PMID: 37294468 Review.
-
Towards CRISPR/Cas crops - bringing together genomics and genome editing.New Phytol. 2017 Nov;216(3):682-698. doi: 10.1111/nph.14702. Epub 2017 Aug 1. New Phytol. 2017. PMID: 28762506 Review.
-
Genome editing and beyond: what does it mean for the future of plant breeding?Planta. 2022 May 19;255(6):130. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03906-2. Planta. 2022. PMID: 35587292 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding.Nat Rev Genet. 2024 Sep;25(9):603-622. doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00720-2. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Nat Rev Genet. 2024. PMID: 38658741 Review.
Cited by
-
Micronutrient Biofortification in Wheat: QTLs, Candidate Genes and Molecular Mechanism.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 28;26(5):2178. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052178. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40076800 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reproducibility of next-generation-sequencing-based analysis of a CRISPR/Cas9 genome edited oil seed rape.Food Chem (Oxf). 2023 Sep 11;7:100182. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2023.100182. eCollection 2023 Dec 30. Food Chem (Oxf). 2023. PMID: 37822547 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Consumer Perceptions and Safety of Genetically Modified Foods in Africa: A Comprehensive Review.Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e4730. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4730. eCollection 2025 Jun. Food Sci Nutr. 2025. PMID: 40463993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breeding for improved digestibility and processing of lignocellulosic biomass in Zea mays.Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 26;15:1419796. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1419796. eCollection 2024. Front Plant Sci. 2024. PMID: 39129761 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accounting for ALA Natural Mutations Enhances the Efficiency of Graphene Oxide Nanopriming in Bar-Modified Arabidopsis.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Aug;12(32):e00058. doi: 10.1002/advs.202500058. Epub 2025 Jun 5. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025. PMID: 40470697 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ahloowalia B. S., Maluszynski M., Nichterlein K. (2004). Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135 (2), 187–204. Springer. 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources