Perceived Impact of COVID-19 Among Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
- PMID: 36073296
- PMCID: PMC10549872
- DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000881
Perceived Impact of COVID-19 Among Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
Erratum in
-
Correction to Port et al. (2022).Crisis. 2023 Sep;44(5):423. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000894. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Crisis. 2023. PMID: 36625849 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Research indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic caused increases in psychological distress and suicidal ideation. Aims: To describe the ways suicidal callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (Lifeline) perceived COVID-19 to have impacted them and assess whether these callers perceived COVID-19-related stress as contributing to their suicidal thoughts. Method: Telephone interviews were conducted with 412 suicidal callers to 12 Lifeline centers. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations between demographic factors and individual COVID-19 stressors and to determine whether callers who endorsed COVID-19-related stress as contributing to their suicidal thoughts differed from those who did not regarding demographics, current suicide risk, history of suicidality, Lifeline use, or individual COVID-19 stressors. Results: Over half of callers reported that COVID-19-related stress contributed to their suicidal ideation (CRSSI). Callers who endorsed CRSSI had higher odds than those who did not of mentioning financial difficulties when asked how COVID-19 impacted them. The two groups of callers did not differ on the other factors examined. Limitations: Interviewed callers may not be representative of all Lifeline callers. Conclusion: Despite the subjective burden of COVID-19-related stress on suicidal Lifeline callers, this was not associated with new suicidality or heightened suicide risk.
Keywords: COVID-19; crisis callers; crisis lines; stress; suicidal ideation.
Similar articles
-
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (Now 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline): Evaluation of Crisis Call Outcomes for Suicidal Callers.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70020. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70020. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025. PMID: 40405822 Free PMC article.
-
National suicide prevention lifeline: enhancing mental health care for suicidal individuals and other people in crisis.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012 Feb;42(1):22-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00068.x. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012. PMID: 22320194
-
Follow-up with Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: Evaluation of Callers' Perceptions of Care.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018 Feb;48(1):75-86. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12339. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018. PMID: 28261860
-
[Suicidal behavior in light of COVID-19 outbreak: Clinical challenges and treatment perspectives].Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S66-S72. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 8. Encephale. 2020. PMID: 32471707 Free PMC article. Review. French.
-
Crisis Lines: Current Status and Recommendations for Research and Policy.Psychiatr Serv. 2023 May 1;74(5):505-512. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220294. Epub 2022 Dec 7. Psychiatr Serv. 2023. PMID: 36475827 Review.
Cited by
-
Older People at Risk of Suicide: A Local Study During the COVID-19 Confinement Period.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;13(14):1735. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141735. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40724759 Free PMC article.
-
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (Now 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline): Evaluation of Crisis Call Outcomes for Suicidal Callers.Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70020. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70020. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025. PMID: 40405822 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Estimating State-Level Increases in Call Demand Costs and Financing.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2023 Jun 1;26(2):85-95. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2023. PMID: 37357873 Free PMC article.
-
Young people's mental and social distress in times of international crisis: evidence from helpline calls, 2019-2022.Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 22;13(1):11858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39064-y. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37481636 Free PMC article.
-
Correction to Port et al. (2022).Crisis. 2023 Sep;44(5):423. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000894. Epub 2023 Jan 10. Crisis. 2023. PMID: 36625849 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- American Psychological Association (2020). Stress in America 2020: A national mental health crisis. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2020/report-october
-
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Bray, M. J. C., Daneshvari, N. O., Radhakrishnan, I., Cubbage, J., Eagle, M., Southall, P., & Nestadt, P. S. (2021). Racial differences in statewide suicide mortality trends in Maryland during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(4), 444–447. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3938 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Copeland, W. E., McGinnis, E., Bai, Y., Adams, Z., Nardone, H., Devadanam, V., Rettew, J., & Hudziak, J. J. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on college student mental health and wellness. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(1), 134–141. 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.466 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical