Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 8:12:04057.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04057.

Female-friendly toilets in schools in Burkina Faso: A mixed-methods study using photo-elicitation

Affiliations

Female-friendly toilets in schools in Burkina Faso: A mixed-methods study using photo-elicitation

Teresa Buitrago-García et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: An absence of gender-sensitive sanitation facilities in schools and the negative effects this has on girls has been widely discussed among advocacy groups, though less examined in academic spheres. Drawing on triangulated data, we outline current challenges and respondent-driven solutions to enhance the female-friendly nature of toilets in a context of extreme poverty.

Methods: This mixed-methods study was informed by the tenets of human-centred design. We first quantitatively assessed facilities in 14 secondary schools in the Kossi Province of Burkina Faso. We then collected qualitative data, including 15 focus group discussions and 53 in-depth interviews among schoolgirls, mothers, teachers and key informants. We applied photo-elicitation, a novel method, to explore perceptions of facilities and the desirability and feasibility of interventions to improve gender-friendly sanitation facilities.

Results: No school met international water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) standards for schools. Roughly one third of schools did not have water and, when present, there was no reliable way to use it within the toilet complex. Schoolgirls shared feelings of shame and stress when menstruating at school, and said that they would avoid using school toilets, if possible. Schoolgirls described water access as the most urgent need to address, followed by fostering privacy and facilitating cleanliness within facilities. Mothers and teachers mostly aligned with these priorities, while key informants additionally emphasised the need to raise awareness on both general and menstrual hygiene and to develop maintenance systems. Photo-elicitation engaged and empowered participants to pinpoint priorities and concrete solutions, namely a need for doors and locks, water containers and cleaning materials.

Conclusions: WASH needs in many schools remain unmet. Women and girls should be involved in decision-making across stages of intervention design and implementation. Young women's voices merit greater inclusion in academic literature. Future interventions should enhance access to water and privacy. Future research could explore maintenance and monitoring strategies to develop guidance on sustainable solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of interests The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design overview.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Set of pictures A, as used in photo-elicitation: Images show a shower space without water, the school’s water source, a latrine and the students’ toilet block.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Set of pictures B, as used in photo elicitation: Images show a teachers’ toilet, a students’ toilet and the students’ toilet block (kettles shown beside them).
Figure 4
Figure 4
WASH framework priorities as discussed by participants. Icon credits: Courtesy of www.flaticons.com: WASH – water, sanitation and hygiene, MHH – menstrual health and hygiene, KI – key informants. Black circle – discussed by almost all, Dark grey circle – discussed by some, Light grey circle – mentioned, White circle – mentioned by none/almost none.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schmitt M, Clatworthy D, Ogello T, Sommer M.Making the Case for a Female-Friendly Toilet. Water. 2018;10:1193. 10.3390/w10091193 - DOI
    1. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, World Health Organization. Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. Progress on sanitation and drinking-water – 2010 Update. Geneva: United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund; 2010.
    1. Sommer M, Ferron S, Cavill S, House S.Violence, gender and WASH: spurring action on a complex, under-documented and sensitive topic. Environ Urban. 2015;27:105-16. 10.1177/0956247814564528 - DOI
    1. Hulland KR, Chase R, Caruso B, Swain R, Biswal B, Sahoo K, et al. Sanitation, Stress, and Life Stage: A Systematic Data Collection Study among Women in Odisha, India. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141883. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141883 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caruso BA, Cooper HLF, Haardörfer R, Yount KM, Routray P, Torondel B, et al. The association between women’s sanitation experiences and mental health: A cross-sectional study in Rural, Odisha India. SSM Popul Health. 2018;5:257-66. 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.06.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed