Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Oct;92(10):2457-2463.
doi: 10.1111/ans.18032. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ning Qi Pang  1 , Celene Shi Ying Ng  2 , Christy Jia Hui Wong  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ning Qi Pang et al. ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Groin hernia repair is a common surgical procedure and includes both open and laparoscopic techniques. Studies comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair specifically in the geriatric population are lacking. This study compares the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair techniques in older adults.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in each of the five selected databases up till June 2021: PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane and PsychInfo (OVID). Outcomes measured included but were not limited to total length of hospital stay, mean total operative time, intraoperative complications, post-operative complications such as wound infection, seroma formation, chronic pain, mesh infection and recurrence of inguinal hernia.

Results: A total of five articles were included in the final analysis. The length of postoperative hospitalization stay was shorter in patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair (95% CI: -1.50 to -0.72; P < 0.01, I2 = 79%). The laparoscopic repair group had a significantly smaller number of patients who sustained postoperative wound infections (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.47; P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and lower incidence of chronic pain (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.37, P < 0.01, I2 = 46%). Analysis of the remaining outcomes did not reveal any statistically significant differences between open and laparoscopic hernia repair.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis showed a shorter length of stay, lower wound infection rates and lower chronic pain with laparoscopic groin hernia repair as compared to open repair in older adults. Future prospective studies examining the impact of age on the relationship between surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic) and surgical outcomes are needed.

Keywords: groin hernia repair; laparoscopic; older adults; open.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003; 362: 1561-71.
    1. Işıl RG, Yazıcı P, Demir U et al. Approach to inguinal hernia in high-risk geriatric patients: should it be elective or emergent? Ulus. Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017; 23: 122-7.
    1. Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Etiology of inguinal hernias: a comprehensive review. Front Surg. 2017; 22: 52.
    1. Wu JJ, Baldwin BC, Goldwater E, Counihan TC. Should we perform elective inguinal hernia repair in the elderly? Hernia 2017; 21: 51-7.
    1. Musbahi A, Abdulhannan P, Nugud O, Garud T. Inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 65 years of age: a district general hospital experience. S. Afr. J. Surg. 2020; 5: 22-6.

LinkOut - more resources