Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):96-106.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02944. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Risk Factors for Heart Failure Among Pan-European Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PanCareSurFup and ProCardio Cohort and Nested Case-Control Study

Affiliations

Risk Factors for Heart Failure Among Pan-European Childhood Cancer Survivors: A PanCareSurFup and ProCardio Cohort and Nested Case-Control Study

Esmée C de Baat et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Heart failure (HF) is a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment for childhood cancer. We evaluated the risk and risk factors for HF in a large European study of long-term survivors. Little is known of the effects of low doses of treatment, which is needed to improve current treatment protocols and surveillance guidelines.

Methods: This study includes the PanCareSurFup and ProCardio cohort of ≥ 5-year childhood cancer survivors diagnosed between 1940 and 2009 in seven European countries (N = 42,361). We calculated the cumulative incidence of HF and conducted a nested case-control study to evaluate detailed treatment-related risk factors.

Results: The cumulative incidence of HF was 2% (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.2) by age 50 years. The case-control study (n = 1,000) showed that survivors who received a mean heart radiation therapy (RT) dose of 5 to < 15 Gy have an increased risk of HF (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.5 to 12.3), when compared with no heart RT. The risk associated with doses 5 to < 15 Gy increased with exposure of a larger heart volume. In addition, the HF risk increased in a linear fashion with higher mean heart RT doses. Regarding total cumulative anthracycline dose, survivors who received ≥ 100 mg/m2 had a substantially increased risk of HF and survivors treated with a lower dose showed no significantly increased risk of HF. The dose-response relationship appeared quadratic with higher anthracycline doses.

Conclusion: Survivors who received a mean heart RT dose of ≥ 5 Gy have an increased risk of HF. The risk associated with RT increases with larger volumes exposed. Survivors treated with < 100 mg/m2 total cumulative anthracycline dose have no significantly increased risk of HF. These new findings might have consequences for new treatment protocols for children with cancer and for cardiomyopathy surveillance guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lars Hjorth

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: BioInvent, Camurus, Cantargia AB, SOBI

Honoraria: Roche, Bayer

Speakers' Bureau: Bayer

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Cumulative incidence of heart failure for all survivors (including all types of treatment) with attained age as the time scale. Shaded: 95% CI.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Cumulative incidence of HF for three different treatment periods: 1960-1979 (No. = 11,456 cohort members and No. = 150 cases), 1980-1989 (No. = 12,660 cohort members and No. = 169 cases), and 1990-2008 (No. = 10,936 cohort members and No. = 66 cases). Pairwise comparisons showed these degrees of significance: 1960-1979 versus 1980-1989, P = .0004; 1960-1979 versus 1990-2008, P = .00008; 1980-1989 versus 1990-2008, P = .3917. (B) Cumulative incidence of cardiac mortality because of HF for three different treatment periods: 1960-1979 (No. = 11,456 cohort members and No. = 56 cases), 1980-1989 (No. = 12,660 cohort members and No. = 62 cases), and 1990-2008 (No. = 10,936 cohort members and No. = 9 cases). Pairwise comparisons showed these degrees of significance: 1960-1979 versus 1980-1989, P = .0001; 1960-1979 versus 1990-2008, P = .73; and 1980-1989 versus 1990-2008, P = .0005. HF, heart failure.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
(A) The ORs and corresponding 95% CIs (red dots and bars) of developing heart failure by the received total cumulative anthracycline dose and the fitted linear EOR and corresponding 95% CIs per 100 mg/m2 anthracyclines (solid blue and gray line), both of which were adjusted for mean heart RT dose. ORs were calculated relative to survivors treated without anthracyclines and are plotted at the mean cumulative anthracyclines dose of the controls within each relevant dose category. (B) The ORs and corresponding 95% CIs (red dots and bars) of developing heart failure by the received mean heart RT dose and the fitted linear EOR and corresponding 95% CIs per 10 Gy mean heart RT (solid blue and gray line), both of which were adjusted for cumulative anthracycline dose. ORs were calculated relative to survivors treated without heart RT and are plotted at the mean cumulative radiation dose of the controls within each relevant dose category. EOR, excess odds ratio; OR, odds ratio; RT, radiation therapy.

References

    1. Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, et al. : Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: Results of EUROCARE-5—A population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:35-47, 2014 - PubMed
    1. Mulrooney DA, Hyun G, Ness KK, et al. : Major cardiac events for adult survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed between 1970 and 1999: Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. BMJ 368:l6794, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fidler MM, Reulen RC, Henson K, et al. : Population-based long-term cardiac-specific mortality among 34 489 five-year survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain. Circulation 135:951-963, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong GT, Oeffinger KC, Chen Y, et al. : Modifiable risk factors and major cardiac events among adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3673-3680, 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Pal HJ, van Dalen EC, van Delden E, et al. : High risk of symptomatic cardiac events in childhood cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 30:1429-1437, 2012 - PubMed

Publication types