Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
- PMID: 36075200
- PMCID: PMC9747731
- DOI: 10.1159/000526446
Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption.
Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18-24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h).
Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948-3,679) and 3,747 (1,301-5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group.
Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; Cytokines; Hemadsorption; Hemoperfusion; Hyperinflammation.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
Dominik Jarczak has received lecture honoraria and travel reimbursement from ADVITOS and CytoSorbents Europe GmbH. Marlene Fischer receives research support from the External Research Program, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MA. Stefan Kluge received research support by Ambu, E.T. View Ltd., Fisher & Paykel, Pfizer, and Xenios, lecture honoraria from ArjoHuntleigh, Astellas, Astra, Basilea, Bard, Baxter, Biotest, CSL Behring, CytoSorbents, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Orion, Pfizer, Philips, Sedana, Sorin, Xenios, and Zoll, and consultant honorarium from AMOMED, Astellas, Baxter, Bayer, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, and Xenios. Axel Nierhaus has received lecture honoraria and travel reimbursement from ThermoFisher Scientific GmbH, Fresenius AG, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH and Biotest AG, Germany over the past 5 years. Daniel Peter Frings reports lecture honoraria within the last 5 years from Xenios AG. Kevin Roedl, Geraldine de Heer, Christoph Burdelski, Barbara Sensen, Olaf Boenisch and Pischtaz Adel Tariparast do not report any conflicts of interest. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- WHO World Map COVID-19. 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous