Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023;52(2):183-192.
doi: 10.1159/000526446. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Hemadsorption Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 (CYTOCOV-19): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Dominik Jarczak et al. Blood Purif. 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption.

Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18-24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h).

Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948-3,679) and 3,747 (1,301-5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group.

Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; Cytokines; Hemadsorption; Hemoperfusion; Hyperinflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dominik Jarczak has received lecture honoraria and travel reimbursement from ADVITOS and CytoSorbents Europe GmbH. Marlene Fischer receives research support from the External Research Program, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MA. Stefan Kluge received research support by Ambu, E.T. View Ltd., Fisher & Paykel, Pfizer, and Xenios, lecture honoraria from ArjoHuntleigh, Astellas, Astra, Basilea, Bard, Baxter, Biotest, CSL Behring, CytoSorbents, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Orion, Pfizer, Philips, Sedana, Sorin, Xenios, and Zoll, and consultant honorarium from AMOMED, Astellas, Baxter, Bayer, Fresenius, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer, and Xenios. Axel Nierhaus has received lecture honoraria and travel reimbursement from ThermoFisher Scientific GmbH, Fresenius AG, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH and Biotest AG, Germany over the past 5 years. Daniel Peter Frings reports lecture honoraria within the last 5 years from Xenios AG. Kevin Roedl, Geraldine de Heer, Christoph Burdelski, Barbara Sensen, Olaf Boenisch and Pischtaz Adel Tariparast do not report any conflicts of interest. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study − screening, randomization and outcome.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival estimates: shown are Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of survival for patients assigned to HT or SMT. The shaded area indicates the intervention period. Log-rank:p= 0.382.

References

    1. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1,591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region Italy. JAMA. 2020 Apr 6;323((16)):1574–1581. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020 May 26;323((20)):2052–2059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO World Map COVID-19. 2021.
    1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382((18)):1708–1720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan China. Lancet. 2020;395((10223)):497–506. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types