Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 31;14(17):4259.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14174259.

Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities

Affiliations
Review

Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities

Giulia Collatuzzo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Cancer occurrence is characterized globally by profound socioeconomic differences. Occupation is a fundamental component of socioeconomic status. In this review, we discuss the role of occupation as a determinant of cancer disparities. First, we address the issue of participation in cancer screening programs based on income, health insurance, occupational status and job title. Second, we review the role of occupation in contributing to disparities by acting as a mediator between cancer and (i) education and (ii) race/ethnicity. Lastly, we analyze data from a multicenter case-control study of lung cancer to calculate the mediating role of occupational exposure to diesel exhaust, silica and welding fumes in the association between education and lung cancer. By addressing the complex paths from occupation to cancer inequalities from multiple points of view, we provide evidence that occupational-related characteristics, such as income, health insurance, unemployment and hazardous exposures impinge on cancer control and outcomes. The increasing awareness of these aspects is fundamental and should lead to public health interventions to avoid inequalities rising from occupational factors.

Keywords: cancer disparities; cancer screening; education; ethnicity; lung cancer; mediation analysis; occupation; occupational exposure; workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bogovski P. Historical perspectives of occupational cancer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A. 1980;6:921–939. doi: 10.1080/15287398009529914. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennaway E.L., Kennaway N.M. The social distribution of cancer of the scrotum and cancer of the penis. Cancer Res. 1946;6:49–53. - PubMed
    1. Costello J. Morbidity and mortality study of shale oil workers in the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;30:205–208. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7930205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nabavizadeh B., Amend G.M., Breyer B.N. Workers Died of Dyes: The Discovery of Occupational Bladder Cancers. Urology. 2021;154:4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boffetta P., Malvezzi M., Pira E., Negri E., La Vecchia C. International Analysis of Age-Specific Mortality Rates From Mesothelioma on the Basis of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. J. Glob. Oncol. 2018;4:1–15. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2017.010116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources