Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 23;15(17):5801.
doi: 10.3390/ma15175801.

Toxicological Risks of the Cobalt-Chromium Alloys in Dentistry: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Toxicological Risks of the Cobalt-Chromium Alloys in Dentistry: A Systematic Review

Brigitte Grosgogeat et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The toxicological risk of Co-Cr dental alloys is actually a sensitive subject with the European regulatory changes, namely regulation (EU) 2017/745 and annex VI to the CLP regulation (EC) 1972/2008. Objectives: The objective of this review is to conduct a rigorous analysis of the cytocompatibility of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) dental alloys. Considering various parameters such as cytotoxicity, type IV hypersensitivity reaction, sensitization, and irritation, we investigated evidence of toxicity of Co-Cr in human dental applications. Data sources: Specific search strategies were performed in three electronic databases, namely Medline, Embase, and Web of Science, using a main restriction in the search regarding the publication date (1995-2022). Study selection: Out of a total of 836 articles, only 21 studies were selected and analyzed according to PRISMA methodology. Results: Among them, 10 in vitro studies using human samples and 11 in vivo studies on human patients were distinguished. Most of the in vitro studies confirmed that Co-Cr alloys have a good cytocompatibility compared to Ni alloys. Regarding the in vivo studies, it appeared that Co-Cr could rarely cause sensitization, irritation, and allergic reactions. Reactions were mainly observed for people allergic to Co or Cr. Nevertheless, titanium-based materials showed better results. Conclusions: This study proposes a new state of the art on Co-Cr dental alloys and will thus be very useful for carrying out additional studies. Relevance: This review will help practitioners in their daily clinical choice.

Keywords: biocompatibility; cobalt; cobalt–chromium alloys; dental; mucosa; oral; toxicity; type IV hypersensitivity reaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.

References

    1. Kassapidou M., Stenport V.F., Hjalmarsson L., Johansson C.B. Cobalt-chromium alloys in fixed prosthodontics in Sweden. Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand. 2017;3:53–62. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2017.1360776. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Imam H., Benetti A.R., Øzhayat E.B., Pedersen A.M.L., Johansen J.D., Thyssen J.P., Jellesen M.S., Gotfredsen K. Cobalt release and complications resulting from the use of dental prostheses. Contact Dermat. 2016;75:377–383. doi: 10.1111/cod.12649. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Han X., Sawada T., Schille C., Schweizer E., Scheideler L., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Rupp F., Spintzyk S. Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength of Co-Cr Dental Alloy Fabricated by Different Manufacturing Processes. Materials. 2018;11:1801. doi: 10.3390/ma11101801. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaicelyte A., Janssen C., Le Borgne M., Grosgogeat B. Cobalt–Chromium Dental Alloys: Metal Exposures, Toxicological Risks, CMR Classification, and EU Regulatory Framework. Crystals. 2020;10:1151. doi: 10.3390/cryst10121151. - DOI
    1. Kim T.-W., Kim W.-I., Mun J.-H., Song M., Kim H.-S., Kim B.-S., Kim M.-B., Ko H.-C. Patch Testing with Dental Screening Series in Oral Disease. Ann. Dermatol. 2015;27:389–393. doi: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources