Electrophysiological Features to Aid in the Construction of Predictive Models of Human-Agent Collaboration in Smart Environments
- PMID: 36080985
- PMCID: PMC9460739
- DOI: 10.3390/s22176526
Electrophysiological Features to Aid in the Construction of Predictive Models of Human-Agent Collaboration in Smart Environments
Abstract
Achieving successful human-agent collaboration in the context of smart environments requires the modeling of human behavior for predicting people's decisions. The goal of the current study was to utilize the TBR and the Alpha band as electrophysiological features that will discriminate between different tasks, each associated with a different depth of reasoning. To that end, we monitored the modulations of the TBR and Alpha, while participants were engaged in performing two cognitive tasks: picking and coordination. In the picking condition (low depth of processing), participants were requested to freely choose a single word out of a string of four words. In the coordination condition (high depth of processing), participants were asked to try and select the same word as an unknown partner that was assigned to them. We performed two types of analyses, one that considers the time factor (i.e., observing dynamic changes across trials) and the other that does not. When the temporal factor was not considered, only Beta was sensitive to the difference between picking and coordination. However, when the temporal factor was included, a transition occurred between cognitive effort and fatigue in the middle stage of the experiment. These results highlight the importance of monitoring the electrophysiological indices, as different factors such as fatigue might affect the instantaneous relative weight of intuitive and deliberate modes of reasoning. Thus, monitoring the response of the human-agent across time in human-agent interactions might turn out to be crucial for smooth coordination in the context of human-computer interaction.
Keywords: EEG; Theta/Beta ratio; coordination; mental workload; smart environments.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An Electrophysiological Model for Assessing Cognitive Load in Tacit Coordination Games.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 9;22(2):477. doi: 10.3390/s22020477. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35062438 Free PMC article.
-
EEG and ECG changes during selected flight sequences.Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Oct;75(10):889-97. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004. PMID: 15497370
-
Effects of mental workload and fatigue on the P300, alpha and theta band power during operation of an ERP (P300) brain-computer interface.Biol Psychol. 2014 Oct;102:118-29. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Biol Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25088378
-
Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.J Vis Exp. 2012 Jun 26;(64):3993. doi: 10.3791/3993. J Vis Exp. 2012. PMID: 22782131 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44:58-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 30. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014. PMID: 23116991 Review.
Cited by
-
Offline EEG hyper-scanning using anonymous walk embeddings in tacit coordination games.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288822. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37471403 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing EEG-based attachment style prediction: unveiling the impact of feature domains.Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 22;15:1326791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1326791. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38318079 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jan’t Hoen P., Tuyls K., Panait L., Luke S., La Poutré J.A. An overview of cooperative and competitive multiagent learning; Proceedings of the International Workshop on Learning and Adaption in Multi-Agent Systems; Utrecht, The Netherlands. 25 July 2005; pp. 1–46.
-
- Rosenfeld A., Zuckerman I., Azaria A., Kraus S. Combining psychological models with machine learning to better predict people’s decisions. Synthese. 2012;189:81–93. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0182-z. - DOI
-
- Kraus S. Predicting human decision-making: From prediction to action; Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction; Southampton, UK. 15–18 December 2018; p. 1.
-
- Rosenfeld A., Bareket Z., Goldman C.V., Kraus S., LeBlanc D.J., Tsimoni O. Learning Driver’s Behavior to Improve the Acceptance of Adaptive Cruise Control; Proceedings of the IAAI; Toronto, ON, Canada. 22–26 July 2012.
-
- Azaria A., Rabinovich Z., Kraus S., Goldman C.V., Tsimoni O. Giving Advice to People in Path Selection Problems; Proceedings of the AAMAS; Valencia, Spain. 4–8 June 2012; pp. 459–466.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical