Benefits of Meniscal Repair in Selected Patients Aged 60 Years and Older
- PMID: 36081411
- PMCID: PMC9445464
- DOI: 10.1177/23259671221117491
Benefits of Meniscal Repair in Selected Patients Aged 60 Years and Older
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the benefits and outcomes of meniscal repair in patients older than 60 years.
Purpose: To (1) report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscal repair in patients aged ≥60 years and compare them with matched patients who underwent meniscectomy and (2) identify procedural failures.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: We included 32 knees in 32 patients aged ≥60 years (20 female, 12 male; mean age, 64.5 ± 4.6 years) who underwent meniscal repair surgery at a single medical institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and meniscal tear type with a comparison cohort who underwent meniscectomy (n = 49 patients [49 knees]; 32 female, 17 male). For all patients, demographic information, clinical history, physical examination findings, treatment details, and radiographic images were reviewed and analyzed. At final follow-up (mean, 42.2 months; range, 13-128 months), patients completed the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Clinical failure was defined as revision surgery and/or progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A matched-pairs t test was used to analyze differences between the 2 treatment groups, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the rates of knee osteoarthritis and progression to TKA.
Results: The majority of patients had a medial meniscal tear (72.8%), whereas the lateral meniscus was torn in 27.2% of cases. Most tears were located in the meniscal root (56.8%), followed by the posterior horn (34.6%) and midbody (8.6%). At final follow-up, all outcome scores were higher in the repair group compared with the meniscectomy group (IKDC, 78.9 ± 13.4 vs 56.0 ± 15.4; KOOS, 86.6 ± 11.9 vs 61.7 ± 16.2; Lysholm, 88.3 ± 13.3 vs 68.7 ± 15.2, respectively; P < .001 for all). Clinical failure was observed in 22% of patients in the repair group.
Conclusion: All clinical outcome scores were higher in the meniscal repair group compared with the matched meniscectomy group at final follow-up. The clinical failure rate of the repair group was 22%. These findings support meniscal repair in selected patients aged ≥60 years.
Keywords: meniscal repair; meniscal tear; meniscectomy; older patients; root tear.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: The authors acknowledge support from the Foderaro-Quattrone Musculoskeletal-Orthopaedic Surgery Research Innovation Fund. This study was partially funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant No. 466023693 to M.H.) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases for the Musculoskeletal Research Training Program (T32AR56950). N.I.K. has received hospitality payments from Encore Medical. M.J.S. has received research support from Stryker and consulting fees, nonconsulting fees, and royalties from Arthrex. A.J.K. has received grant support from DJO; consulting fees from Arthrex, the Joint Restoration Foundation, and Responsive Arthroscopy; speaking fees from Arthrex; royalties from Arthrex and Responsive Arthroscopy; and honoraria from Vericel and the Joint Restoration Foundation; he serves on the medical board of trustees for the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation. D.B.F.S. has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Relationship Between Preoperative Extrusion of the Medial Meniscus and Surgical Outcomes After Partial Meniscectomy.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(8):1864-1871. doi: 10.1177/0363546517697302. Epub 2017 Mar 28. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28350516
-
Lateral Meniscal Tears in Young Patients: A Comparison of Meniscectomy and Surgical Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 11;9(10):23259671211046057. doi: 10.1177/23259671211046057. eCollection 2021 Oct. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34660830 Free PMC article.
-
Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study.Bone Joint J. 2022 Jun;104-B(6):680-686. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B6.BJJ-2021-1340.R2. Bone Joint J. 2022. PMID: 35638209 Review.
-
Medial Versus Lateral Meniscus Root Tears: Is There a Difference in Injury Presentation, Treatment Decisions, and Surgical Repair Outcomes?Arthroscopy. 2020 Apr;36(4):1135-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.098. Epub 2020 Jan 20. Arthroscopy. 2020. PMID: 31973989
-
Comparison of Long-term Radiographic Outcomes and Rate and Time for Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty Between Repair and Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jun;50(7):2023-2031. doi: 10.1177/03635465211017514. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34251898
Cited by
-
Novel approach to meniscal vascularity evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence-guided knee arthroscopy.BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Jun 25;7(1):e000351. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000351. eCollection 2025. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025. PMID: 40574785 Free PMC article.
-
Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Mar;18(3):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09940-9. Epub 2024 Dec 26. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025. PMID: 39724360 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Jul;18(7):229-245. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09966-7. Epub 2025 Apr 23. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025. PMID: 40266511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HT) in patients aged 50 or older.J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70371. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70371. eCollection 2025 Jul. J Exp Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40689096 Free PMC article.
-
Meniscus Ripstop Stitches: A Useful Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of Challenging Radial Tears of the Meniscus.Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Aug 23;14(1):103173. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103173. eCollection 2025 Jan. Arthrosc Tech. 2024. PMID: 39989684 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, et al. Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(10):2333–2339. - PubMed
-
- Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Clinical healing rates of meniscus repairs of tears in the central-third (red-white) zone. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(1):134–146. - PubMed
-
- Barrett GR, Field MH, Treacy SH, Ruff CG. Clinical results of meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(8):824–829. - PubMed
-
- Bhatia S, LaPrade CM, Ellman MB, LaPrade RF. Meniscal root tears: significance, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(12):3016–3030. - PubMed
-
- Brophy RH, Wojahn RD, Lillegraven O, Lamplot JD. Outcomes of arthroscopic posterior medial meniscus root repair: association with body mass index. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(3):104–111. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources