Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 23:13:915929.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915929. eCollection 2022.

Remote training as a common tool for the different professionals involved in the acute phase after terror attacks across Europe: Perspectives from an expert panel

Affiliations

Remote training as a common tool for the different professionals involved in the acute phase after terror attacks across Europe: Perspectives from an expert panel

Florence Askenazy et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

The acute response after a terror attack may have a crucial impact on the physical and psychological wellbeing of the victims. Preparedness of the professionals involved in the acute response is a key element to ensure effective interventions, and can be improved through trainings. Today in Europe there is a recognized lack of inter-professional and international trainings, which are important, among others, to respond to the needs and the rights of victims affected by a terrorist attack in another country than their home country. In this paper we report the perspectives of an expert panel composed by different categories of professionals on the possible role of interprofessional trainings provided remotely. The experts discussed the pertinence of remote trainings for professionals involved in the acute response of a terror attack, and highlighted their Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT analysis). We concluded that, while remote trainings cannot replace in-person trainings, they may be useful to share knowledge about the role and the organization of the different categories of professionals, thus potentially improving response coordination, and to easily share good practices across professionals and countries.

Keywords: SWOT analysis; acute response phase; information and communication technologies; remote training; terror attack.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Askenazy F, Gindt M, Chauvelin L, Battista M, Guenolé F, Thümmler S. Early phase psychiatric response for children and adolescents after mass trauma: Lessons learned from the truck-ramming attack in nice on July 14th, 2016. Front Psychiatry. (2019) 10:65. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisson J, Tavakoly B. The TENTS Guidelines for Psychosocial care Following Disasters and Major Incidents. Wales: The European Network for Traumatic Stress; (2008).
    1. French P, Barrett A, Allsopp K, Williams R, Brewin CR, Hind D, et al. Psychological screening of adults and young people following the Manchester arena incident. BJPsych Open. (2019) 5:e85. 10.1192/bjo.2019.61 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karki FU. Norway’s 2011 terror attacks: Alleviating National Trauma with a large-scale proactive intervention model. Psychiatr Serv. (2015) 66(9):910–2. 10.1176/appi.ps.201500050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu SY, Lim S. Collective trauma and mental health hospitalization rates among children in New York State, 1999–2013: Age. Period, and cohort effects. J Traum Stress. (2020) 33:824–34. 10.1002/jts.22449 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources