Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 23:4:963578.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.963578. eCollection 2022.

The characteristics of the breaststroke pullout in elite swimming

Affiliations

The characteristics of the breaststroke pullout in elite swimming

Carla McCabe et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Since the rule change permitting the inclusion of one dolphin kick during the underwater breaststroke pullout phase following a swim start or turn, there has been an emergence of several different pullout techniques adopted by elite swimmers. The aim of this study was to characterize the underwater breaststroke pullout technique trends and to assess the effectiveness of each technique as utilized by elite male and female swimmers. The sample included 60 swimmers (n = 26 male, n = 34 female) competing across the 50, 100, and 200 m long-course breaststroke final races from the World Championships 2015, 2017, 2019 and Olympic Games 2016. An above-water camera was used to identify and measure the different phases of the underwater pullout techniques, which was found to be a highly accurate methodological approach (ICC = 0.97). From the 150 trials analyzed, three different pullout techniques were identified: the Fly-Kick First technique, the Combined technique and the Pull-Down First technique. Although the most common underwater pullout technique utilized by elite competitive breaststroke swimmers was the Combined technique (n = 71), followed by the Fly-Kick First technique (n = 65) and the Pull-Down First technique (n = 14), it was observed that technical selection deviates according to gender. This indicates that male and female swimmers should not be coached adhering to the same technical model. This study found no significant difference in terms of performance outcome with respect to each of these techniques, indicating that technique selection should be guided by one's individual preference. It was concluded that the results of this study will serve as an up-to-date resource for coaches and swimmers working with elite breaststroke swimmers and as a useful insight to current underwater pullout trends.

Keywords: breaststroke; competition; fly-kick placement; race-analysis; start; turn; underwater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author ET was employed by Forethought Pty Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Identification of key movement positions during the breaststroke underwater pullout phase with respect to the arm actions (A.1 to A.5) [A = arm]. (B) Identification of key movement positions during the breaststroke underwater pullout phase with respect to the leg actions (L.1 to L.9) [L = leg].
Figure 2
Figure 2
A phase duration sequence of the Fly-Kick First Technique. Refer to Figures 1A,B for number and letter annotation information.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Breaststroke pullout phase profile variations; indicating the primary difference in arm and leg action sequence across the Fly-Kick First, the Combined and the Pull-Down First techniques. The numbers 1, 2, and 3 represent the first three phases of the pullout [1st Glide, Dolphin Kick, and Pull Down phase].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Underwater breaststroke pullout technique trends for elite swimmers during the period 2015–2019.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Underwater breaststroke pullout trends across all race distances for male and female elite swimmers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Connaboy C., Coleman S., Moir G., Sanders R. (2010). Measures of reliability in the kinematics of maximal undulatory underwater swimming. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 24, 762–770. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181badc68 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cossor J. M., Mason B. R. (2001). Swim start performances at the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the International Synopsium of Biomechanics in Sports.
    1. Ferguson C. J. (2009). An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 40, 532–538. 10.1037/a0015808 - DOI
    1. FINA. (2017). FINA Swimming Rules 2017 - 2021. Available online at: http://www.fina.org/sites/default/files/2017_2021_swimming_16032018.pdf (accessed May 09, 2022).
    1. Gonjo T., Olstad B. H. (2021). Race analysis in competitive swimming: a narrative review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 69. 10.3390/ijerph18010069 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources