Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Summer;35(3):327-334.
doi: 10.2337/ds21-0043. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

Patient Decision-Making About Self-Disclosure of a Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Patient Decision-Making About Self-Disclosure of a Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study

Christy J W Ledford et al. Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Summer.

Abstract

Background: Effective self-management of type 2 diabetes requires receiving support, which can result from disclosing the diagnosis to a support network, including coworkers, family, and friends. As a primarily invisible disease, diabetes allows people to choose whether to disclose. This study qualitatively explores the factors that influence a person's decision to disclose diabetes to others.

Methods: Research coordinators recruited 22 interview participants, ranging in age from 32 to 64 years, whose medical records included a diagnosis code for type 2 diabetes. Participants received care from one of two U.S. medical centers. Semi-structured interviews lasted approximately 1 hour and were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed. Verification strategies such as memo-keeping and maintaining methodological coherence/congruence were used throughout analysis to promote rigor.

Results: In patients' descriptions of their decision-making processes regarding whether to disclose their diagnosis, six themes emerged. Three motivations prompted open disclosure: 1) to seek information, 2) to seek social support, and 3) to end the succession of diabetes, and the other three motivations prompted guarded disclosure: 4) to prepare for an emergency, 5) to maintain an image of health, and 6) to protect employment.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend three communicative actions for clinicians as they talk to patients about a diabetes diagnosis. First, clinicians should talk about the benefits of disclosure. Second, they should directly address stereotypes in an effort to de-stigmatize diabetes. Finally, clinicians can teach the skills of disclosure. As disclosure efficacy increases, a person's likelihood to disclose also increases. Individuals can use communication as a tool to gain the knowledge and support they need for diabetes self-management and to interrupt the continuing multigenerational development of diabetes within their family.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weller SC, Baer R, Nash A, Perez N. Discovering successful strategies for diabetic self-management: a qualitative comparative study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017;5:e000349 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munir F, Leka S, Griffiths A. Dealing with self-management of chronic illness at work: predictors for self-disclosure. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1397–1407 - PubMed
    1. Strom JL, Egede LE. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep 2012;12:769–781 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi S, Toyama J, Brecht ML. Effect of disclosure on receiving spousal support in Korean immigrants with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2020;46:559–568 - PubMed
    1. Whitford DL, McGee H, O’Sullivan B. Will people with type 2 diabetes speak to family members about health risk? Diabetes Care 2009;32:251–253 - PMC - PubMed