Effectiveness of perampanel as the only add-on: Retrospective, multicenter, observational real-life study on epilepsy patients
- PMID: 36082380
- PMCID: PMC9712478
- DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12649
Effectiveness of perampanel as the only add-on: Retrospective, multicenter, observational real-life study on epilepsy patients
Abstract
Objective: Perampanel (PER) is indicated as adjunctive antiseizure medication (ASM) in adolescents and adults with epilepsy. Data from clinical trials show good efficacy and tolerability, while limited information is available on the routine clinical use of PER, especially when used as only add-on treatment.
Methods: We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study on people with focal or generalized epilepsy aged >12 years, consecutively recruited from 52 Italian epilepsy centers. All patients received PER as the only add-on treatment to a background ASM according to standard clinical practice. Retention rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6, and 12 months after PER introduction. Subanalyses by early or late use of PER and by concomitant ASM were also conducted.
Results: Five hundred and three patients were included (age 36.5 ± 19.9 years). Eighty-one percent had focal epilepsy. Overall, the retention rate was very high in the whole group (89% at 12 months) according with efficacy measures. No major differences were observed in the subanalyses, although patients who used PER as early add-on, as compared with late add-on, more often reached early seizure freedom at 3-month follow-up (66% vs 53%, P = .05). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25%, far less commonly than in PER randomized trials.
Significance: This study confirms the good efficacy and safety of PER for focal or generalized epilepsy in real-life conditions. We provide robust data about its effectiveness as only add-on treatment even in patients with a long-standing history of epilepsy and previously treated with many ASMs.
Keywords: early add‐on; perampanel; real‐world; seizure freedom.
© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Conflict of interest statement
Prof. Umberto Aguglia (speaker honoraria from Eisai); Dr Fedele Dono (travel support and speaker honoraria from EISAI); Dr. Alfredo D'Aniello (Research grant for UCB Pharma and Speaker/Honoraria for Eisai, UCB Pharma, Angelini Pharma and Lusofarmaco); Dr. Giancarlo Di Gennaro (speaker honoraria from EISAI, UCB‐Pharma, Livanova, Lusofarmaco, GW Pharmaceuticals. Served on advisory boards for Bial, Arielle therapeutics, Angelini Pharma); Prof. Edoardo Ferlazzo (speaker honoraria from UCB, Eisai, Angelini); Dr. Pasquale Striano (P.S. speaker honoraria and participated on advisory boards for Biomarin, Zogenyx, GW Pharmaceuticals, research funding by ENECTA BV, GW Pharmaceuticals, Kolfarma Srl). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Figures
References
-
- Krauss GL, Perucca E, Kwan P, Ben‐Menachem E, Wang XF, Shih JJ, et al. Final safety, tolerability, and seizure outcomes in patients with focal epilepsy treated with adjunctive perampanel for up to 4 years in an open‐label extension of phase III randomized trials: study 307. Epilepsia. 2018;59(4):866–76. 10.1111/epi.14044 - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources