Resistance Analyses in Highly Treatment-Experienced People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Treated With the Novel Capsid HIV Inhibitor Lenacapavir
- PMID: 36082606
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac364
Resistance Analyses in Highly Treatment-Experienced People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Treated With the Novel Capsid HIV Inhibitor Lenacapavir
Abstract
Background: Lenacapavir (LEN) is a first-in-class inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function in clinical development for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH) harboring multidrug resistance (MDR) in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here we describe resistance analyses conducted in the pivotal phase 2/3 CAPELLA study.
Methods: CAPELLA enrolled viremic HTE PWH with resistance to ≥3 of 4 of the main antiretroviral (ARV) classes and resistance to ≥2 ARV drugs per class. Baseline resistance analyses used commercial assays (HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase genotypic/phenotypic tests). Postbaseline resistance was evaluated in participants experiencing virologic failure.
Results: At baseline, 46% of participants had resistance to the 4 main ARV drug classes, with one-third of participants having exhausted all drugs from ≥3 of the 4 main ARV classes. Treatment with LEN + OBR for 26 weeks led to viral suppression in 81% of participants. Postbaseline resistance mutations to lenacapavir occurred in 8 participants (6 with M66I, 1 with K70H, 1 with Q67H + K70R) who were receiving unintended functional LEN monotherapy at the time of resistance selection.
Conclusions: LEN added to OBR led to high efficacy in this HTE patient population with MDR but could select for resistance when used unintentionally as functional monotherapy.
Keywords: HIV; capsid; lenacapavir; monotherapy; multidrug resistance; optimized background regimen.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors are employees and stockholders of Gilead Sciences, Inc. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
