Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)
- PMID: 36083265
- PMCID: PMC9747029
- DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194
Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)
Abstract
Introduction: Dismembered open pyeloplasty described by Anderson and Hynes is the "gold standard" for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of our study was to compare the results of open (OP) vs laparoscopic (LP) vs robotic (RALP) pyeloplasty.
Material and methods: A multicenter prospective review was conducted of pyeloplasty surgeries performed at five high-volume centers between 2014 and 2018. Demographic data, history of prenatal hydronephrosis, access type, MAG3 renogram and differential renal function, surgery time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate (Clavien-Dindo) were recorded. Access type was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests.
Results: A total of 322 patients were included: 62 OP, 86 LP, and 174 RALP. The mean age was 8.13 (r: 1-16) years, with a statistically significant lower age (mean 5 years) in OP (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the side affected. Operative time was 110.5 min for OP, 140 min for LP, and 179 min for RALP (p < 0.0001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RALP group than in the other groups (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative complications and reoperations between the three groups.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery for the management of UPJO in children is gaining more acceptance, even in patients younger than 1-year-old. Operative time continues to be significantly shorter in OP than in LP and RALP. Hospital stay was shorter in RALP compared to the other techniques. No differences were found in complication rates, type of complications, and reoperation rate.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; Robotics; Ureteral Obstruction.
Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Minimally invasive surgery for pyeloplasty poised to become The preferred surgical technique irrespective of age.Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Nov-Dec;48(6):969-970. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194.1. Int Braz J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36173408 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Pediatr Urol. 2019. PMID: 31734119
-
Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 12. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27346071
-
Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Mar;35(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04435-y. Epub 2019 Jan 14. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019. PMID: 30643964
-
A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 3. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 36117037
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z. Epub 2019 Sep 10. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31506749 Review.
Cited by
-
Primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis highlighted in this number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology.Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Nov-Dec;48(6):888-890. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.06.01. Int Braz J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36173404 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05541-8. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023. PMID: 37673951
-
Comparison of the treatment effect of laparoscopic and robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 6;19(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02528-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40618311
-
Efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric hydronephrosis caused by symptomatic versus asymptomatic endogenous ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a retrospective analysis.J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241232968. doi: 10.1177/03000605241232968. J Int Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38460542 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 30;14(8):e087519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087519. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39214660 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21:209–214. - PubMed
-
- O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87:287–289. - PubMed
-
- Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153:1962–1965. - PubMed
-
- Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, Zhang H, Zheng L, Tong Q. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2011;25:727–736. - PubMed
-
- Tan HL, Roberts JP. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results. Br J Urol. 1996;77:909–913. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous