Fatalistic cancer beliefs and self-reported cancer screening behaviors among diverse urban residents
- PMID: 36083412
- DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00358-7
Fatalistic cancer beliefs and self-reported cancer screening behaviors among diverse urban residents
Abstract
Cancer fatalism-the belief that death is inevitable when cancer is present-has been identified as a barrier to cancer screening, detection, and treatment. Our study examined the relationship between self-reported cancer fatalism and adherence to cancer screening guidelines of the breasts, cervix, colon, and prostate among a diverse sample of urban-dwelling adults in Brooklyn, New York. Between May 2019 and August 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults 40 + years of age (n = 2,341) residing in Brooklyn neighborhoods with high cancer mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the odds of reporting cancer screening completion across three fatalistic cancer belief categories (low, med, high). Participants' median age was 61 (IQR 51, 71) years, 61% were women, 49% self-identified as non-Hispanic black, 11% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 6% more than one race. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of low, some, or high fatalistic beliefs identified among male respondents compared to women. Among women, we observed that high fatalistic cancer beliefs were associated with higher odds (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.10-3.65) of completing breast but not cervical (1.04; CI 0.55-1.99) or colon (1.54; CI 0.88-2.69) cancer screening. Men with high fatalistic cancer beliefs had a trend towards lower odds of prostate screening (OR 0.53: 95% CI 0.18-1.57) compared to men with low fatalistic beliefs, but neither was statistically significant. Findings suggest that high fatalistic cancer beliefs may be an important factor in cancer screening utilization among women. Further examination in longitudinal cohorts with a larger sample of men may be needed in order to identify any significant effect.
Keywords: Cancer screening; Communication; Fatalism; Risk reduction; Social networks.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Allen, J. D., Sorensen, G., Stoddard, A. M., Peterson, K. E., & Colditz, G. (1999). The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine : A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 21(3), 193–200. - DOI
-
- Cohen, M. (2013). Cancer fatalism: Attitudes toward screening and care. . In S. J. Carr B. (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cancer. . Boston, MA.: Springer.
-
- Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? an examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98. - DOI
-
- Espinosa, L., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). The relevance of fatalism in the study of latinas’ cancer screening behavior: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9119-4 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
