Post-Trauma Discharge Instructions: Are We Dropping the Ball?
- PMID: 36083613
- PMCID: PMC10829078
- DOI: 10.1177/00031348221111515
Post-Trauma Discharge Instructions: Are We Dropping the Ball?
Abstract
Introduction: Complex follow-up plans for polytrauma patients are compiled at the end of hospitalization into discharge instructions. We sought to identify how often patient discharge instructions incorrectly communicated specialist recommendations. We hypothesized that patients with more complex hospitalizations would have more discharge instruction errors (DI-errors).
Methods: We reviewed adult trauma inpatients (March 2017-March 2018), excluding those who left against medical advice or were expected to follow up outside our system. Complex hospitalizations were represented using injury severity (ISS), hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (iLOS), and number of consultants (NC). We recorded the type of consultant (surgical or nonsurgical), and consultant recommendations for follow-up. DI-errors were defined as either follow-up necessary but omitted or follow-up not necessary yet present on the instructions. Patients with DI-errors were compared to patients without DI-errors. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-square (alpha <.05).
Results: We included 392 patients (median age 45 [IQR 26-58], ISS 14 [10-21], LOS 6 [3-11]). 55 patients (14%) had DI-errors. Factors associated with DI-errors included the total number of consultants and use of nonsurgical consultants. ISS, LOS, iLOS, were not associated with DI-errors.
Conclusion: Common measures of admission complexity were not associated with DI-errors, although the number and type of consultants were associated with DI-errors. Non-surgical specialty consultant recommendations were more likely to be omitted. It is crucial for patients to receive accurate discharge instructions, and systematic processes are needed to improve communication with the patients at discharge.
Keywords: adherence; coordination of care; followup; trauma.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Karmisholt J, Andersen S, Laurberg P. Variation in thyroid function tests in patients with stable untreated subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid. 2008;18(3):303–308. - PubMed
-
- Hawkins NM, Scheuermeyer FX, Youngson E, et al. Impact of cardiology follow-up care on treatment and outcomes of patients with new atrial fibrillation discharged from the emergency department. Europace. 2020;22(5):695–703. - PubMed
-
- Keren D, Matter I, Rainis T, Lavy A. Getting the most from the sleeve: the importance of post-operative follow-up. Obes Surg. 2011;21(12):1887–1893. - PubMed
-
- Battistella FD, Torabian SZ, Siadatan KM. Hospital readmission after trauma: an analysis of outpatient complications. J Trauma. 1997;42(6):1012–1016; discussion 1016–1017. - PubMed
-
- Stone ME Jr., Marsh J, Cucuzzo J, Reddy SH, Teperman S, Kaban JM. Factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance after discharge: experience at an urban Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(1):185–190. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
