Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274382.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274382. eCollection 2022.

Combining epidemiology and economics to assess control of a viral endemic animal disease: Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS)

Affiliations

Combining epidemiology and economics to assess control of a viral endemic animal disease: Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS)

Pablo Valdes-Donoso et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is an extremely contagious disease that causes great damage to the U.S. pork industry. PRRS is not subject to official control in the U.S., but most producers adopt control strategies, including vaccination. However, the PRRS virus mutates frequently, facilitating its ability to infect even vaccinated animals. In this paper we analyze how increased vaccination on sow farms reduces PRRS losses and when vaccination is profitable. We develop a SIR model to simulate the spread of an outbreak between and within swine farms located in a region of Minnesota. Then, we estimate economic losses due to PRRS and calculate the benefits of vaccination. We find that increased vaccination of sow farms increases the private profitability of vaccination, and also transmits positive externalities to farms that do not vaccinate. Although vaccination reduces industry losses, a low to moderate vaccine efficacy implies that large PRRS losses remain, even on vaccinated farms. Our approach provides useful insight into the dynamics of an endemic animal disease and the benefits of different vaccination regimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual flow of our SIR model.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Baseline scenario of PRRS spread under three strains.
(A) Number of New Positive Farms (Bars) and Cumulative Economic Losses (Red Lines). (B) Marginal Economic Losses for Each Infected Farm over Time.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Spatial distribution of reported PRRS cases (2012–2014), and simulated PRRS cases for a high and a low virulent strain.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Distribution of losses per animal estimated under two viral strains in sow, nursery, and finishing farms.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Marginal benefits from individual adoption of vaccination when varying infecting strains and vaccine efficacy.
Note: The estimated marginal cost of vaccination (MC) is a constant $5.9/year per animal.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Marginal benefits of vaccination for three infecting strains, increasing amounts of collective vaccination and varying vaccine efficacy.
Note: The estimated marginal cost of vaccination (MC) is a constant $5.90/year per animal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sumner DA. Exotic Pests and Diseases. Biology and Economics for Biosecurity. First. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press; 2003.
    1. Jarvis LS, Valdes-Donoso P. A Selective Review of the Economic Analysis of Animal Health Management. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2015; 1–25. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12131 - DOI
    1. Hennessy DA. Behavioral Incentives, Equilibrium Endemic Disease, and Health Management Policy for Farmed Animals. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2007;89: 698–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01001.x - DOI
    1. Perez AM, Davies PR, Goodell CK, Holtkamp DJ, Mondaca-Fernández E, Poljak Z, et al.. Lessons learned and knowledge gaps about the epidemiology and control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in North America. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;246: 1304–1317. doi: 10.2460/javma.246.12.1304 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holtkamp DJ, Kliebenstein JB, Neumann EJ, Zimmerman JJ, Rotto HF, Yoder TK, et al.. Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers. J Swine Health Prod. 2013;21: 72–84.

MeSH terms