Interception of fertile soil phosphorus leaching with immobilization materials: Recent progresses, opportunities and challenges
- PMID: 36084834
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136337
Interception of fertile soil phosphorus leaching with immobilization materials: Recent progresses, opportunities and challenges
Abstract
The non-point source pollution induced by phosphorus (P) leaching from fertile soils is accelerating the eutrophication phenomena in aqueous ecosystems. Herein, to alleviate and intercept the P leaching from the fertile soils, diverse P immobilization materials (PIM) which can transform labile P into stable P via a range of physicochemical and biological interactions have been adopted and received increasing research interest. However, the remediation mechanisms of different PIMs were complex and vary with soil properties and PIM application methods. In this review, the P fraction and mobility characteristics of different fertile soils were first introduced. Then, three kinds of PIM including inorganic materials (e.g., clay minerals and red mud), organic materials (e.g., polyacrylamide), and composites (e.g., modified biochar) applied in soil P leaching interception were concluded. The key factors (i.e., soil pH, soil texture, organic matter content and variable soil moisture) influencing PIM performance and potential PIMs used for reducing soil P leaching were also introduced. Current review can favor for proposing more suitable and insightful strategies to regulate the fertile soil P and achieve the dual goals of improving the crop land quality and yield, and preventing agricultural non-point source pollution.
Keywords: Fertile soil; Immobilization materials; Inorganic materials; Phosphorus leaching; Soil threshold.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Comparative value of phosphate sources on the immobilization of lead, and leaching of lead and phosphorus in lead contaminated soils.Sci Total Environ. 2011 Jan 15;409(4):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.003. Epub 2010 Dec 4. Sci Total Environ. 2011. PMID: 21130488
-
Identifying biotic and abiotic processes of reversing biochar-induced soil phosphorus leaching through biochar modification with MgAl layered (hydr)oxides.Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 15;843:157037. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157037. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Sci Total Environ. 2022. PMID: 35777556
-
Topsoil and subsoil properties influence phosphorus leaching from four agricultural soils.J Environ Qual. 2013 Mar-Apr;42(2):455-63. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0224. J Environ Qual. 2013. PMID: 23673838
-
Effects of biochar addition on the abundance, speciation, availability, and leaching loss of soil phosphorus.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 1;758:143657. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143657. Epub 2020 Nov 20. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 33250256 Review.
-
Analysis of the long-term effectiveness of biochar immobilization remediation on heavy metal contaminated soil and the potential environmental factors weakening the remediation effect: A review.Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Jan 1;207:111261. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111261. Epub 2020 Sep 17. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021. PMID: 32950873 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources