Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 9;6(1):64.
doi: 10.1038/s41698-022-00303-6.

Impact of TP53 mutations in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Impact of TP53 mutations in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Zahi I Mitri et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. .

Abstract

Identifying triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients expected to have poor outcomes provides an opportunity to enhance clinical management. We applied an Evolutionary Action Score to functionally characterize TP53 mutations (EAp53) in 96 TNBC patients and observed that EAp53 stratification may identify TP53 mutations associated with worse outcomes. These findings merit further exploration in larger TNBC cohorts and in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Association of TP53 mutational status and clinical outcomes.
a Lollipop plot showing location and sequence of TP53 mutations in study cohort. Pink mutations denote those comprising the EAp53 1-69 group. b RFS Kaplan–Meier curves by tumor TP53 mutation status and location (log-rank test p = 0.162). c Kaplan–Meier curves by EAp53 category. d RFS Kaplan–Meier curves by pCR status (log-rank test p < 0.001). e RFS Kaplan–Meier curves by tumor TP53 mutation status for 43 patients who did not achieve a pCR (log-rank test p = 0.111).

References

    1. Gamucci T, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a multicentric retrospective observational study in real-life setting. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:2313–2323. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. von Minckwitz G, et al. Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011;125:145–156. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1228-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roy V, et al. N0338 phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every two weeks as induction therapy for stage II or III breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:563–563. doi: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.563. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang HR, et al. Differential response of triple-negative breast cancer to a docetaxel and carboplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment. Cancer. 2010;116:4227–4237. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25309. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature490, 61–70 (2012). - PMC - PubMed