Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30422.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030422.

Immunosuppressive therapy versus supportive care in IgA nephropathy patients with stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease

Affiliations

Immunosuppressive therapy versus supportive care in IgA nephropathy patients with stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease

Gabriel Ștefan et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

The use of immunosuppressive therapy for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. We performed a monocentric retrospective study on 83 consecutive IgAN patients with stage 3 or 4 CKD and proteinuria ≥0.75 g/d (age 41 [33-56] years, 72% male, estimated glomerular filtration rate 36.1 [25.4-47.5] mL/min/1.73 m2) who received uncontrolled supportive care (Supp) (n = 36), corticosteroids/corticotherapy (CS) (n = 14), or CS combined with monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide (CS + CFM) (n = 33) between 2010 and 2017. Patients were followed until composite endpoint (doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage kidney disease (dialysis or kidney transplant) or death, whichever came first) or end of study (January 2020). Patients were followed for a median of 29 (95% confidence interval = 25.2-32.7) months, and 12 (15%) patients experienced the composite endpoint. Within the limitation of a retrospective study, our results suggest no benefit from immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgAN with stage 3 and 4 CKD as compared with supportive care. There were no differences between the 3 studied groups regarding age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, Oxford classification score, arterial hypertension, and therapy with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Mean kidney survival time for the entire cohort was 81.0 (95% confidence interval = 73.1-89.0) months, without significant differences between the 3 groups. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for IgAN progression factors, immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with better kidney survival when compared with supportive therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patients’ flow chart. Composite endpoint: doubling of serum creatinine, ESKD (dialysis or kidney transplant) or death, whichever came first. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESKD = end-stage kidney disease, IgAN = immunoglobulin A nephropathy, sCr = serum creatinine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative event-free survival (Kaplan–Meier analysis), there was similar kidney survival time between the 3 groups. CS = corticosteroids/corticotherapy, CFM = cyclophosphamide.

References

    1. Schena FP, Nistor I. Epidemiology of IgA nephropathy: a global perspective. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38:435–42. - PubMed
    1. Glassock RJ. Mortality risk in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:720–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tesar V, Troyanov S, Bellur S, et al. Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective analysis from the VALIGA study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2248–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, et al. Intensive supportive care plus immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2225–36. - PubMed
    1. Rauen T, Wied S, Fitzner C, et al. After ten years of follow-up, no difference between supportive care plus immunosuppression and supportive care alone in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2020;98:1044–52. - PubMed