Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Oct;23(10):1321-1331.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00508-3. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Effect of dexamethasone on dyspnoea in patients with cancer (ABCD): a parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of dexamethasone on dyspnoea in patients with cancer (ABCD): a parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

David Hui et al. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Systemic corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for palliation of dyspnoea in patients with cancer, despite scarce evidence to support their use. We aimed to assess the effect of high-dose dexamethasone versus placebo on cancer-related dyspnoea.

Methods: The parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, controlled ABCD (Alleviating Breathlessness in Cancer Patients with Dexamethasone) trial was done at the at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the general oncology clinic at Lyndon B Johnson General Hospital (both in Houston, TX, USA). Ambulatory patients with cancer, aged 18 years or older, and with an average dyspnoea intensity score on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0=none, 10=worst) over the past week of 4 or higher were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dexamethasone 8 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days followed by 4 mg orally every 12 h for 7 days, or matching placebo capsules for 14 days. Pharmacists did permuted block randomisation with a block size of six, and patients were stratified by baseline dyspnoea score (4-6 vs 7-10) and study site. Patients, research staff, and clinicians were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was change in dyspnoea NRS intensity over the past 24 h from baseline to day 7 (±2 days). Analyses were done by modified intention-to-treat (ie, including all patients who were randomly assigned and started the study treatment, regardless of whether they completed the study). Enrolment was stopped after the second preplanned interim analysis, when the futility criterion was met. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03367156) and is now completed.

Findings: Between Jan 11, 2018, and April 23, 2021, we screened 2867 patients, enrolled 149 patients, and randomly assigned 128 to dexamethasone (n=85) or placebo (n=43). The mean change in dyspnoea NRS intensity from baseline to day 7 (±2 days) was -1·6 (95% CI -2·0 to -1·2) in the dexamethasone group and -1·6 (-2·3 to -0·9) in the placebo group, with no significant between-group difference (mean 0 [95% CI -0·8 to 0·7]; p=0·48). The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were infections (nine [11%] of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group vs three [7%] of 43 in the placebo group), insomnia (seven [8%] vs one [2%]), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (three [4%] vs none [0%]). Serious adverse events, all resulting in hospital admissions, were reported in 24 (28%) of 85 patients in the dexamethasone group and in three (7%) of 43 patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group.

Interpretation: High-dose dexamethasone did not improve dyspnoea in patients with cancer more effectively than placebo and was associated with a higher frequency of adverse events. These data suggest that dexamethasone should not be routinely given to unselected patients with cancer for palliation of dyspnoea.

Funding: US National Cancer Institute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests DH reports research grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) for the present study. SKH reports a research grant from the NIH for the present study and has been an advisory board member for the Physician–Patient Alliance for Health and Safety. DLU reports research funding from the NIH. SS reports research grants from the NIH. GB reports research grants from AbbVie, Adicet, Amgen, Ariad, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Instil Bio, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Tyme Oncology, Xcovery, Virogin Biotech, Maverick Therapeutics, BeiGene, Rgeneron, Cytomx Therapeutics, Intervenn Biosciences, and Onconova Therapeutics; consulting fees from AbbVie, Adicet, Amgen, Ariad, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Instil Bio, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Tyme Oncology, Xcovery, Virogin Biotech, Maverick Therapeutics, BeiGene, Rgeneron, Cytomx Therapeutics, Intervenn Biosciences, and Onconova Therapeutics; has participated in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Virogin Biotech and Maverick Therapeutics; has stock or stock options in Virogin Biotech; and has an immediate family member employed at Johnson & Johnson and Janssen. JYC reports research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Legion Healthcare Partner; and has co-chaired the PTCOG Scientific Committee. SJG reports research grants from Nanobiotix, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Gateway Foundation; and has received honoraria from Texas Radiological Society. AT reports research grants from Millennium, Polaris, Epizyme, and EMD Serono; and has leadership or fiduciary role in Genentech, BMS, Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, EMD Serono, Merck, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sellas Life Science, and Takeda. EB reports research grants from the NIH for the present study. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Trial Profile.
*Other reasons for ineligibility were chronic systemic corticosteroid use (n=21), infection requiring antibiotics within the past 2 weeks (n=20), concurrent clinical trials (n=20), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (n=17), delirium (n=13), no active cancer (n=8), heart failure exacerbation (n=7), uncontrolled diabetes (n=6), systemic therapy precluding corticosteroid use (n=6), high anxiety (n=5), allergy to dexamethasone (n=4), major surgery within the past 2 weeks (n=3), and post-surgical open wound (n=3).

Comment in

References

    1. Solano JP, Gomes B, Higginson IJ. A comparison of symptom prevalence in far advanced cancer, AIDS, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and renal disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 31: 58–69. - PubMed
    1. Dudgeon DJ, Kristjanson L, Sloan JA, Lertzman M, Clement K. Dyspnea in cancer patients: prevalence and associated factors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 21: 95–102. - PubMed
    1. Reddy SK, Parsons HA, Elsayem A, Palmer JL, Bruera E. Characteristics and correlates of dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2009; 12: 29–36. - PubMed
    1. Hui D, Morgado M, Vidal M, et al. Dyspnea in Hospitalized Advanced Cancer Patients: Subjective and Physiologic Correlates. J Palliat Med. 2013; 16: 274–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hui D, Dos Santos R, Chisholm G, Bruera E. Symptom Expression in the Last 7 Days of Life among Cancer Patients Admitted to Acute Palliative Care Units. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 50: 488–94 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data