Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Mar;167(3):957-964.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.032. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus conventional redo surgery for degenerated mitral valve prostheses and rings in a multicenter registry

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation versus conventional redo surgery for degenerated mitral valve prostheses and rings in a multicenter registry

Michal Szlapka et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Degeneration of mitral prostheses/rings may be treated by redo surgery, and, recently, by transcatheter valve-in-valve/ring implantation. This multicenter registry presents results of transcatheter valve-in-valve and repeat surgery for prostheses/rings degeneration.

Methods: Data provided by 10 German heart centers underwent propensity score-matched retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day/midterm mortality. Perioperative outcome was assessed according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Further, the influence of moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on 30-day/midterm mortality was analyzed.

Results: Between 2014 and 2019, 273 patients (79 transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve [TM-ViV] and 194 redo mitral valve replacement [Re-MVR]) underwent repeat procedure for mitral prosthesis/ring degeneration. Propensity score matching distinguished 79 patient pairs. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II-predicted risk was 15.7 ± 13.7% in the TM-ViV group and 15.0% ± 12.7% in the Re-MVR group (P = .5336). TM-ViV patients were older (74.73 vs 72.2 years; P = .0030) and had higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (54 vs 40 patients; P = .0233). Severe TR incidence was similar (17.95% in TM-ViV vs 14.10%; P = .1741). Sixty-eight TM-ViV patients previously underwent mitral valve replacement, whereas 41 Re-MVR patients underwent valve repair (P < .0001). Stenosis was the leading degeneration mechanism in 42 TM-ViV versus 22 Re-MVR patients (P < .0005). The 30-day/midterm mortality did not differ between groups. Moderate or greater TR was a predictor of total (odds ratio [OR], 4.36; P = .0011), 30-day (OR, 3.76; P = .0180), and midterm mortality (OR, 4.30; P = .0378), irrespective of group.

Conclusions: In both groups, observed mortality was less than predicted. Redo surgery enabled treatment of concomitant conditions, such as atrial fibrillation or TR. TR was shown to be a predictor of total, 30-day, and midterm mortality in both groups.

Keywords: mitral valve prosthesis/ring; prosthesis/ring degeneration; redo mitral surgery; transcatheter mitral valve in valve; tricuspid regurgitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Commentary: Mitral valve-in-valve: This is the way?
    Millar JK, Ailawadi G. Millar JK, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):965-966. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.034. Epub 2022 Aug 10. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 36109209 No abstract available.

References

Publication types