Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 10;8(1):203.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01161-6.

An external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care (PolyPrime)

Collaborators, Affiliations

An external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care (PolyPrime)

Audrey Rankin et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: For older populations with multimorbidity, polypharmacy (use of multiple medications) is a standard practice. PolyPrime is a theory-based intervention developed to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of the PolyPrime intervention in primary care in Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI).

Methods: This external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) aimed to recruit 12 general practitioner (GP) practices (six in NI; six in the ROI counties that border NI) and ten older patients receiving polypharmacy (≥ 4 medications) per GP practice (n = 120). Practices allocated to the intervention arm watched an online video and scheduled medication reviews with patients on two occasions. We assessed the feasibility of collecting GP record (medication appropriateness, health service use) and patient self-reported data [health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health service use)] at baseline, 6 and 9 months. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and medication-related burden quality-of-life (MRB-QoL) tool. An embedded process evaluation and health economics analysis were also undertaken. Pre-specified progression criteria were used to determine whether to proceed to a definitive cRCT.

Results: Twelve GP practices were recruited and randomised. Three GP practices withdrew from the study due to COVID-related factors. Sixty-eight patients were recruited, with 47 (69.1%) being retained until the end of the study. GP record data were available for 47 patients for medication appropriateness analysis at 9 months. EQ-5D-5L and MRB-QoL data were available for 46 and 41 patients, respectively, at 9 months. GP record and patient self-reported health service use data were available for 47 patients at 9 months. Health service use was comparable in terms of overall cost estimated from GP record versus patient self-reported data. The intervention was successfully delivered as intended; it was acceptable to GPs, practice staff, and patients; and potential mechanisms of action have been identified. All five progression criteria were met (two 'Go', three 'Amend').

Conclusion: Despite challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study has demonstrated that it may be feasible to conduct an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care across two healthcare jurisdictions.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41009897 . Registered 19 November 2019.

Clinicaltrials: gov, NCT04181879 . Registered 02 December 2019.

Keywords: Behaviour change; Complex intervention; General practice; Older people; Pilot study; Polypharmacy; Prescribing; Primary care; Process evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram for the PolyPrime study. GPP, general practitioner practice; IQR, interquartile range. aThe number of patients screened for eligibility relates to 8 GPPs as information was not available for 4 GPPs. bThe number of patients contacted and consented relates to 10 GPPs as two GPPs withdrew from the study after randomisation but before baseline data collection and before any details on patient numbers could be obtained. cOne intervention arm GPP withdrew from the study, and patients did not receive any medication reviews; however, 3 patients were followed up for the patient-reported outcome questionnaires. dAn additional patient withdrew consent from study, but the primary outcome data were collected prior to withdrawal

References

    1. Cadogan CA, Ryan C, Hughes CM. Appropriate polypharmacy and medicine safety: when many is not too many. Drug Saf. 2016;39:109–116. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0378-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez-Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010. BMC Med. 2015;13:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0322-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGarrigle C, Donoghue O, Scarlett S, Kenny RA. Health and wellbeing: active ageing for older adults in Ireland. Dublin: The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA): 2017. https://tilda.tcd.ie/publications/reports/pdf/w3-key-findings-report/TIL.... Accessed 26 Feb 2022.
    1. Donaldson LJ, Kelley ET, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kieny MP, Sheikh A. Medication without harm: WHO’s third global patient safety challenge. Lancet. 2017;389:1680–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31047-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . Medication safety in polypharmacy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

Associated data