Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec:41:100626.
doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100626. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

The role of public involvement in the design of the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study during an evolving pandemic

Maria Piggin  1 , Emma Smith  2 , Peter Mankone  3 , Leah Ndegwa  3 , Diane Gbesemete  4 , Philippa Pristerà  5 , Michael Bahrami-Hessari  6 , Halle Johnson  5 , Andrew P Catchpole  7 , Peter J M Openshaw  2 , Christopher Chiu  8 , Robert C Read  4 , Helen Ward  5 , Caroline Barker  9
Affiliations

The role of public involvement in the design of the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study during an evolving pandemic

Maria Piggin et al. Epidemics. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

High quality health care research must involve patients and the public. This ensures research is important, relevant and acceptable to those it is designed to benefit. The world's first human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2 undertook detailed public involvement to inform study design despite the urgency to review and establish the study. The work was integral to the UK Research Ethics Committee review and approval of the study. Discussion with individuals from ethnic minorities within the UK population supported decision-making around the study exclusion criteria. Public review of study materials for consent processes led to the addition of new information, comparisons and visual aids to help volunteers consider the practicalities and risks involved in participating. A discussion exploring the acceptability of a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2 taking place in the UK, given the current context of the pandemic, identified overall support for the study. Public concern for the wellbeing of trial participants, as a consequence of isolation, was identified. We outline our approach to public involvement and its impact on study design.

Keywords: Ethics; Human challenge study; Public involvement; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

ga1
Graphical abstract
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barker C., Collet K., Gbesemete D., Piggin P., Watson D., Pristerà P., Lawrence W., Smith E., Bahrami-Hessari M., Johnson H., Baker K., Qavi A., McGrath C., Chiu C., Read R.C., Ward H. Public attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2: a mixed-methods study. Wellcome Open Res. 2022 (in press) - PMC - PubMed
    1. British Medical Association, 2022. COVID-19: the risk to BAME doctors. Available from: 〈https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/covid-19/your-health/covid-19....
    1. Clift A., Coupland C., Keogh R., Diaz-Ordaz K., Williamson E., Harrison E.H., Hayward A., Hemingway H., Horby P., Mehta N., Benger J., Khunti K., Spielgelhalter D., Skeikh A., Valabhji J., Lyons R.A., Robson J., Semple M.G., Kee F., Johnson P., Jess S., Williams T., Hippisley-Cox K. Living risk prediction algorithm (QCOVID) for risk of hospital admission and mortality from coronavirus 19 in adults: national derivation and validation cohort study. Br. Med. J. 2020;(371:m3731) doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3731. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies H. UK Research Ethics Committee's review of the global first SARS-CoV-2 human infection challenge studies. J. Med. Ethics. 2021 doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gbesemete D., Barker M., Lawrence W.T., Watson D., de Graaf H., Read R.C. Exploring the acceptability of controlled human infection with SARSCoV2–a public consultation. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01670-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types