Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 16;7(9):2016-2028.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.05.035. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Refining Kidney Survival in 383 Genetically Characterized Patients With Nephronophthisis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Refining Kidney Survival in 383 Genetically Characterized Patients With Nephronophthisis

Jens Christian König et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nephronophthisis (NPH) comprises a group of rare disorders accounting for up to 10% of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in children. Prediction of kidney prognosis poses a major challenge. We assessed differences in kidney survival, impact of variant type, and the association of clinical characteristics with declining kidney function.

Methods: Data was obtained from 3 independent sources, namely the network for early onset cystic kidney diseases clinical registry (n = 105), an online survey sent out to the European Reference Network for Rare Kidney Diseases (n = 60), and a literature search (n = 218).

Results: A total of 383 individuals were available for analysis: 116 NPHP1, 101 NPHP3, 81 NPHP4 and 85 NPHP11/TMEM67 patients. Kidney survival differed between the 4 cohorts with a highly variable median age at onset of ESKD as follows: NPHP3, 4.0 years (interquartile range 0.3-12.0); NPHP1, 13.5 years (interquartile range 10.5-16.5); NPHP4, 16.0 years (interquartile range 11.0-25.0); and NPHP11/TMEM67, 19.0 years (interquartile range 8.7-28.0). Kidney survival was significantly associated with the underlying variant type for NPHP1, NPHP3, and NPHP4. Multivariate analysis for the NPHP1 cohort revealed growth retardation (hazard ratio 3.5) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) treatment (hazard ratio 2.8) as 2 independent factors associated with an earlier onset of ESKD, whereas arterial hypertension was linked to an accelerated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline.

Conclusion: The presented data will enable clinicians to better estimate kidney prognosis of distinct patients with NPH and thereby allow personalized counseling.

Keywords: end-stage kidney disease; genetic variant severity; genotype-phenotype correlations; kidney survival; nephronophthisis; prognostic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient recruitment. Phenotypic data of 383 genetically characterized individuals was obtained from 3 independent sources: the Network of Early Onset Cystic Kidney Diseases clinical registry (n = 105), an online survey sent out to the members of the ERKNet (n = 60) and a complementary literature search (n = 218). Homogeneous data from 116 NPHP1 patients obtained from the Network of Early Onset Cystic Kidney Diseases registry (n = 80) and the online survey (n = 36) was fused for analyzes of impact of clinical factors. Gene-specific and variant-related kidney survival was analyzed including all 383 genetically characterized individuals (NPHP1: n = 116; NPHP3: n = 101; NPHP4: n = 81; NPHP11/TMEM67: n = 85) originating from the Network of Early Onset Cystic Kidney Diseases registry (n = 105), the online survey (n = 60) and a comprehensive literature search (n = 218). ERKNet, European Reference Network for Rare Kidney Diseases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gene-related kidney survival. Differences in gene-related kidney survival displayed as Kaplan–Meier survival curve (a) and median age (black line)/interquartile range for the onset of ESKD in 50%, 25% and 75% of participants (b). Significant statements: NPHP1 vs. NPHP3: P < 0.0001; NPHP1 versus NPHP4: P < 0.003; NPHP1 versus NPHP11: P = 0.057; NPHP3 versus NPHP4: P < 0.0001; NPHP3 versus NPHP11: P < 0.0001; NPHP4 versus NPHP11: P = 0.539; NPHP1 versus NPHP3 vs. NPHP4 versus NPHP11: P < 0.0001. ESKD, end-stage kidney disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variant-related kidney survival. Genetic variants for NPHP3, NPHP4, and NPHP11/TMEM67 were subclassified into truncating/truncating, truncating/missense or missense/missense, defined by the presence of either 2 loss of function, 1 loss of function and 1 missense mutation or 2 missense mutations. The NPHP1 group was divided into biallelic truncating including a homozygous deletion and others. NPHP3 (n = 98) (a); NPHP4 (n = 81) (b); NPHP1 (n = 116) (c); NPHP11 (n = 85) (d).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cross-sectional analysis of NPHP1 patients identifying clinical factors. Multivariate cross-sectional analysis identifying clinical factors for an early onset of ESKD in patients with NPHP1 gene variations (a). Univariate cross-sectional analysis of NPHP1 patients displaying the differences in annual deltaGFR (e.g., eGFR slope = deltaGFR male - deltaGFR female) for multiple clinical characteristics: ACEI treatment and most strikingly arterial hypertension were associated with an accelerated GFR decline; however, in a multivariate approach adjusted for each characteristic, only the influence of arterial hypertension remained significant (b). ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative eGFR trajectories from 4 patients with biallelic NPHP1 variants and temporary ACEI treatment. In all 4 cases, eGFR decline was more pronounced under the influence of ACEIs compared with no treatment-irrespective of CKD stage and age. However, no statistical significance was reached. ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

References

    1. Stokman M.F., Saunier S., Benmerah A. Renal ciliopathies: sorting out therapeutic approaches for nephronophthisis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:653138. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.653138. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harambat J., van Stralen K.J., Kim J.J., Tizard E.J. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:363–373. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1939-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. König J, Ermisch-Omran B, Omran H. Nephronophthisis and autosomal dominant interstitial kidney disease (ADIKD). Pediatric Kidney Disease. In: Geary, D., Schaefer, F. (eds) Pediatric Kidney Disease. Springer; 2021:369-388.
    1. Titieni A., König J. Nephronophthise und assoziierte Ziliopathien. med genet. 2018;30:461–468. doi: 10.1007/s11825-018-0213-3. - DOI
    1. Luo F., Tao Y.H. Nephronophthisis: a review of genotype-phenotype correlation. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018;23:904–911. doi: 10.1111/nep.13393. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources