Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 1;5(5):e788.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.788. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients

Affiliations

Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients

Anwar Medellin Abueta et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Hartmann's procedure (HP) is used in surgical emergencies such as colonic perforation and colonic obstruction. "Temporary" colostomy performed during HP is not always reversed in part due to potential morbidity and mortality associated with reversal. There are several contributing factors for patients requiring a permanent colostomy following HP. Therefore, there is still some discussion about which technique to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative variables of patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal using a laparoscopic and open approach.

Methods: The multicenter retrospective cohort study was done between January 2009 and December 2019 at 14 institutions globally. Patients who underwent Hartmann's reversal laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) approaches were evaluated and compared. Sociodemographic, preoperative, intraoperative variables, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. The main outcomes evaluated were 30-day mortality, length of stay, complications, and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Five hundred and two patients (264 in the LS and 238 in the OS group) were included. The most prevalent sex was male in 53.7%, the most common indication was complicated diverticular disease in 69.9%, and 85% were American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) II-III. Intraoperative complications were noted in 5.3% and 3.4% in the LS and OS groups, respectively. Small bowel injuries were the most common intraoperative injury in 8.3%, with a higher incidence in the OS group compared with the LS group (12.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.5). Inadvertent injuries were more common in the small bowel (3%) in the LS group. A total of 17.2% in the OS versus 13.3% in the LS group required intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.2). The most frequent postoperative complication was ileus (12.6% in OS vs. 9.8% in LS group, p = 0.4)). Reintervention was required mainly in the OS group (15.5% vs. 5.3% in LS group, p < 0.5); mortality rate was 1%.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal is safe and feasible, associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with open surgery.

Keywords: colostomy; laparoscopy; laparotomy; operative surgical procedures; patient outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The first port is located in the transition of the right upper and inferior quadrants with the mid clavicular line using the open Hasson technique to avoid incidental bowel injuries. (B) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis is performed using an advanced bipolar sealing energy device and laparoscopic scissors using the shaving technique to avoid accidental and missed bowel injuries. (C) Laparoscopic identification and dissection of the rectal stump. (D) Hybrid open and laparoscopic end colostomy resection.

References

    1. Cellini C, Deeb AP, Sharma A, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Association between operative approach and complications in patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1094‐1099. - PubMed
    1. van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Schouten ES, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:743‐752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onder A, Gorgun E, Costedio M, et al. Comparison of short‐term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open hartmann reversal: a case‐matched study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26:e75‐e79. - PubMed
    1. Arkenbosch J, Miyagaki H, Kumara HM, Yan X, Cekic V, Whelan RL. Efficacy of laparoscopic‐assisted approach for reversal of hartmann's procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2109‐2114. - PubMed
    1. Yang PF, Morgan MJ. Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:965‐969. - PubMed