Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;11(8):1678-1691.
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-544.

Development and validation of a dynamic survival nomogram for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort

Affiliations

Development and validation of a dynamic survival nomogram for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort

Qing Wang et al. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Limited efficacy and poor prognosis are common in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An accurate and useful nomogram helps the clinician predict the prognosis of the patients. However, there has been no previous report on the nomogram specially for predicting the overall survival (OS) of metastatic NSCLC patients.

Methods: A total of 18,343 patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included and divided into the training cohort (n=12,840) and the internal validation cohort (n=5,503), and 242 patients in Renji Hospital were additionally enrolled as the external validation cohort. Demographical, clinical, and OS data were collected. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to develop a nomogram based on the training cohort. To validate the nomogram, we applied C-indexes, calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and a Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

Results: The multivariate Cox regression model found that there were a total of 16 independent risk factors for OS of the patients (all 16 factors showed P<0.001), which were integrated into the nomogram with a C-index of 0.702 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.684-0.720]. The nomogram also exhibited good prognostic value in the internal validation cohort (C-index =0.699, 95% CI: 0.673-0.725) and external validation cohort (C-index =0.695, 95% CI: 0.653-0.737). The ROC and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses demonstrated a high discriminative ability. High-risk patients had significantly less favorable OS than low-risk patients in the SEER population and external validation cohort (both P<0.001). The DCA analysis showed that the nomogram provided better prognosis prediction than the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system.

Conclusions: We constructed and validated a dynamic nomogram with 16 variables based on a large-scale population of SEER database to predict the prognosis of metastatic NSCLC patients. The nomogram is expected to provide higher predictive ability and accuracy than the TNM staging system.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); metastasis; nomogram; overall survival (OS); prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-544/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient screening and study design. SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ROC, receiver operating curve; DCA, decision curve analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomogram for predicting the probability of 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival. ***, P<0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Calibration curves predicting the survival probability less than 3 (A), 6 (B), and 12 (C) months in the training, internal, and external cohorts.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves and AUCs at 3-, 6-, and 12-month in the training cohort (A), internal validation cohort (B), and the external validation cohort (C). ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier curves of OS for risk stratification in the training cohort (A), internal validation cohort (B), and the external validation cohort (C). OS, overall survival.
Figure 6
Figure 6
DCA of AJCC 8th TNM stage and nomogram for 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS of the training (A), internal (B), and external cohorts (C). DCA, decision curve analysis; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; OS, overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7-33. 10.3322/caac.21654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209-49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim W, Ridge CA, Nicholson AG, et al. The 8th lung cancer TNM classification and clinical staging system: review of the changes and clinical implications. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2018;8:709-18. 10.21037/qims.2018.08.02 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39-51. 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018;29:iv192-237. 10.1093/annonc/mdy275 - DOI - PubMed