Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;32(5):667-690.
doi: 10.1177/09593543221095079. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters: Introducing the agential stance

Affiliations

Communication in youth mental health clinical encounters: Introducing the agential stance

Clara Bergen et al. Theory Psychol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

When young people seek support from mental health care practitioners, the encounters may affect the young people's sense of self, and in particular undermine their sense of agency. For this study, an interdisciplinary team of academics and young people collaboratively analysed video-recorded encounters between young people and mental healthcare practitioners in emergency services. They identified five communication techniques that practitioners can use to avoid undermining the young person's sense of agency in the clinical encounter. They conceptualise the use of those techniques as the adoption of an agential stance towards the young person. The agential stance consists of: (a) validating the young person's experiences, (b) legitimising the young person's choice to seek help, (c) refraining from objectifying the young person, (d) affirming the young person's capacity to contribute to positive change, and (e) involving the young person in the decision-making process.

Keywords: empathy; epistemic injustice; sense of agency; validation; youth mental health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The agential ladder.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barnes R. K. (2018). Preliminaries to treatment recommendations in UK primary care: A vehicle for shared decision making? Health Communication, 33(11), 1366–1376. 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellairs-Walsh I., Perry Y., Krysinska K., Byrne S. J., Boland A., Michail M., Lamblin M., Gibson K. L., Lin K., Yutong Li T., Hetrick S., Robinson J. (2020). Best practice when working with suicidal behaviour and self-harm in primary care: A qualitative exploration of young people’s perspectives. BMJ Open, 10(10), Article e038855. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038855 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergen C., McCabe R. (2021). Negative stance towards treatment in psychosocial assessments: The role of personalised recommendations in promoting acceptance. Social Science & Medicine, 290, Article 114082. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114082 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birkhäuer J., Gaab J., Kossowsky J., Hasler S., Krummenacher P., Werner C., Gerger H. (2017). Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 12(2), Article e0170988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boden-Stuart Z. V., Larkin M., Harrop C. (2021). Young adults’ dynamic relationships with their families in early psychosis: Identifying relational strengths and supporting relational agency. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 94(3), 646–666. 10.1111/papt.12337 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources