Microbiological findings and prescribing trends in SARS- CoV-2 positive patients in two United Kingdom Hospitals
- PMID: 36091659
- PMCID: PMC9446536
- DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100246
Microbiological findings and prescribing trends in SARS- CoV-2 positive patients in two United Kingdom Hospitals
Abstract
Objective: To describe antibiotic prescribing and microbiological findings in patients admitted to two London hospitals with COVID-19.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected adults admitted between 9th February and 10th May 2020. Demographics, critical care unit (CCU) admission, antibiotic prescribing and microbiology results within 10 days of COVID-19 diagnosis were analysed.
Results: 1155 patients were identified. 32.9% (380) died. 12.4% (143) had positive microbiology. After excluding likely contaminants, 6.9% (80) had clinically significant microbiology. The most common organisms isolated from blood cultures were Escherichia coli 9.5% (7), Klebsiella pneumoniae 4.0% (3), and Staphylococcus aureus 2.7% (2). A high percentage of blood cultures yielded coagulase negative staphylococci (51/74, 68.9%) and likely represented contamination. Organisms isolated from lower respiratory tract samples included Candida albicans 44.4% (12), Staphylococcus aureus 22.2% (6), Klebsiella species 11.0% (3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 11.0% (3), and Citrobacter species 11% (3). Legionella and pneumococcal urinary antigen tests were positive in 0/117 and 2/71 (2.8%) samples. 91% (1051) of patients received antibiotics. Clarithromycin (24.2% total antibiotic use) and amoxicillin (21%) were most frequently used, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (12.6%), gentamicin (10.6%), co-amoxiclav (9.3%) and meropenem (3.2%). Piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem use was associated with a higher length of stay and mortality.
Conclusions: Positive microbiology in COVID-19 patients is uncommon. Antibiotic use was widespread, despite lack of microbiological evidence of co-infection. When present, positive microbiology was more likely due to gram negative bacteria. Current local clinical and antimicrobial guidelines have incorporated these findings and recommend against routine antibiotic use in COVID-19 patients.
Keywords: Antibiotics; Antimicrobial stewardship; COVID-19; Microbiological findings; SARS-CoV-2.
© 2022 The Authors.
Figures
References
-
- Rawson T.M., Moore L.S.P., Zhu N., Ranganathan N., Skolimowska K., Gilchrist M., et al. Bacterial and Fungal Coinfection in Individuals With Coronavirus: A Rapid Review To Support COVID-19 Antimicrobial Prescribing. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(9):2459–2468. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa530. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yang X., Yu Y., Xu J., Shu H., Xia J., Liu H., et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):475–481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Russell C.D., Fairfield C.J., Drake T.M., Turtle L., Seaton R.A., Wootton D.G., et al. Co-infections, secondary infections, and antimicrobial use in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 during the first pandemic wave from the ISARIC WHO CCP-UK study: a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Microbe. 2021;2(8):e354–e365. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00090-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
